High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Patterson, E. [1 ]
Stokes, P. [4 ]
Cutajar, D. [1 ]
Rosenfeld, A. [1 ,2 ]
Baines, J. [4 ,5 ]
Metcalfe, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Powers, M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med & Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Townsville Hosp, Townsville Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
MR-linac; Elekta Unity; MOSFET; Skin dose; Surface dosimetry; Monte Carlo; MV RADIOTHERAPY ACCELERATOR; SKIN DOSE MEASUREMENT; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MOSKIN DETECTOR; TLD EXTRAPOLATION; SCANNER; BEAM; ORIENTATION; ENTRANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-023-01251-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin (TM), for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin (TM) entry surface doses, relative to D-max, were (9.9 +/- 0.2)%, (10.1 +/- 0.3)%, (11.3 +/- 0.6)%, (12.9 +/- 1.0)%, and (13.4 +/- 1.0)% for 1 x 1 cm(2), 3 x 3 cm(2), 5 x 5 cm(2), 10 x 10 cm(2), and 22 x 22 cm(2) fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin (TM) measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 x 10 cm(2) field size using the MOSkin (TM) and 17.9% for the 22 x 22 cm(2) field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin (TM) detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 800
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Implementational and Site-Specific Workflows for a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Dunkerley, David A. P.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    St-Aubin, Joel J.
    Anderson, Carryn M.
    Caster, Joseph M.
    Smith, Mark C.
    Buatti, John M.
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [32] Deep learning based modelling of radiation dose deposition in a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Schneider, Moritz
    Gutwein, Simon
    Nyazi, Maximilian
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3674 - S3676
  • [33] Facilitating 1.5T MR-Linac adoption: Workflow strategies and practical tips
    Michel, Madeline
    Paquier, Zelda
    Bouchart, Christelle
    Gulyban, Akos
    Jullian, Nicolas
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    Poeta, Sara
    Reynaert, Nick
    Martinive, Philippe
    van den Begin, Robbe
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [34] Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Plans Between 1.5T MR-Linac and Conventional Linac
    Ding, Shouliang
    Li, Yongbao
    Liu, Hongdong
    Li, Rui
    Wang, Bin
    Zhang, Jun
    Chen, Yan
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
  • [35] Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac adapt-to-position workflow
    Liang, Jiayi
    Scripes, Paola Godoy
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Subashi, Ergys
    Wunner, Theresa
    Cote, Nicolas
    Chan, Ching-Yun
    Ng, Angela
    Brennan, Victoria
    Zakeri, Kaveh
    Wildberger, Cassandra
    Mechalakos, James
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (03):
  • [36] Patient expectation and experience of MR-guided radiotherapy using a 1.5T MR-Linac
    van Otterloo, S. R. de Mol
    Westerhoff, J. M.
    Leer, T.
    Rutgers, R. H. A.
    Meijers, L. T. C.
    Daamen, L. A.
    Intven, M. P. W.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [37] Design and feasibility of a flexible, on-body, high impedance coil receive array for a 1.5 T MR-linac
    Zijlema, Stefan E.
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Malkov, Victor N.
    van Dijk, Luca
    Hackett, Sara L.
    Kok, An G. M.
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    van den Bergh, Cornelis A. T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (18)
  • [38] Gel dosimetry with an anthropomorphic phantom in an Elekta Unity MR-linac
    Ferrer, Carlos
    Huertas, Concepcion
    Navarro, Inma
    Deben, Beatriz
    Morera, Rosa
    Saez, Moises
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3187 - S3189
  • [39] A back-projection algorithm in the presence of an extra attenuating medium: towards EPID dosimetry for the MR-Linac
    Torres-Xirau, I.
    Olaciregui-Ruiz, I.
    Rozendaal, R. A.
    Gonzalez, P.
    Mijnheer, B. J.
    Sonke, J-J
    van der Heide, U. A.
    Mans, A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (15) : 6322 - 6340
  • [40] Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Barnes, Helen
    Alexander, Sophie
    Bower, Lorna
    Ehlers, Jakob
    Gani, Cihan
    Herbert, Trina
    Lawes, Rebekah
    Moller, Pia Krause
    Morgan, Toby
    Nowee, Marlies E.
    Smith, Gillian
    van Triest, Baukelien
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Whiteside, Lee
    McNair, Helen
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 : 31 - 37