High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Patterson, E. [1 ]
Stokes, P. [4 ]
Cutajar, D. [1 ]
Rosenfeld, A. [1 ,2 ]
Baines, J. [4 ,5 ]
Metcalfe, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Powers, M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med & Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Townsville Hosp, Townsville Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
MR-linac; Elekta Unity; MOSFET; Skin dose; Surface dosimetry; Monte Carlo; MV RADIOTHERAPY ACCELERATOR; SKIN DOSE MEASUREMENT; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MOSKIN DETECTOR; TLD EXTRAPOLATION; SCANNER; BEAM; ORIENTATION; ENTRANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-023-01251-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin (TM), for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin (TM) entry surface doses, relative to D-max, were (9.9 +/- 0.2)%, (10.1 +/- 0.3)%, (11.3 +/- 0.6)%, (12.9 +/- 1.0)%, and (13.4 +/- 1.0)% for 1 x 1 cm(2), 3 x 3 cm(2), 5 x 5 cm(2), 10 x 10 cm(2), and 22 x 22 cm(2) fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin (TM) measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 x 10 cm(2) field size using the MOSkin (TM) and 17.9% for the 22 x 22 cm(2) field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin (TM) detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 800
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Out-of-field dose and its constituent components for a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Yang, Bin
    Tang, Ka Keung
    Huang, Chen-Yu
    Geng, Hui
    Lam, Wai Wang
    Wong, Yeung Sum
    Tse, Mei Yan
    Lau, Ka Ki
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Yu, Siu Ki
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (22)
  • [12] Elekta Unity MR-linac commissioning: mechanical and dosimetry tests
    Tsuneda, Masato
    Abe, Kota
    Fujita, Yukio
    Ikeda, Yohei
    Furuyama, Yoshinobu
    Uno, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 64 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [13] Comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy plan optimisation methods for a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Chuter, Robert
    van Herk, Marcel
    Akhiat, Hafid
    Voet, Peter
    MacKay, Ranald
    Choudhury, Ananya
    McWilliam, Alan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (01): : 43 - 49
  • [14] Influence and optimization strategy of the magnetic field in 1.5 T MR-linac liver stereotactic radiotherapy
    Liu, Xin
    Yin, Peijun
    Li, Tengxiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Zhenjiang
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [15] Dosimetric evaluation of off-axis fields and angular transmission for the 1.5 T MR-linac
    van den Dobbelsteen, M.
    Hackett, S. L.
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    van Asselen, B.
    Oolbekkink, S.
    Woodings, S. J.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (20)
  • [16] Quantifying uncertainties associated with reference dosimetry in an MR-Linac
    Iakovenko, Viktor
    Keller, Brian
    Malkov, Victor N. N.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (11):
  • [17] Dosimetry with the TruView gel on a 0.35 T MR-Linac: A feasibility study
    Ermeneux, L.
    Petitfils, A.
    Marage, L.
    Gschwind, R.
    Huet, C.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2024, 175
  • [18] MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning
    Chea, Michel
    Croise, Mathilde
    Huet, Christelle
    Bassinet, Celine
    Benadjaoud, Mohamed-Amine
    Jenny, Catherine
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [19] A virtual phantom for patient-specific QA On A 1.5T MR-linac
    Ji, Mingshuo
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Tian, Yuan
    Zhang, Ke
    Li, Minghui
    Chen, Yan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (05):
  • [20] Feasibility of using a commercial collapsed cone dose engine for 1.5T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification
    Li, Yongbao
    Wang, Bin
    Ding, Shouliang
    Liu, Hongdong
    Liu, Biaoshui
    Xia, Yunfei
    Song, Ting
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 80 : 288 - 296