High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Patterson, E. [1 ]
Stokes, P. [4 ]
Cutajar, D. [1 ]
Rosenfeld, A. [1 ,2 ]
Baines, J. [4 ,5 ]
Metcalfe, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Powers, M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med & Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Townsville Hosp, Townsville Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
MR-linac; Elekta Unity; MOSFET; Skin dose; Surface dosimetry; Monte Carlo; MV RADIOTHERAPY ACCELERATOR; SKIN DOSE MEASUREMENT; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MOSKIN DETECTOR; TLD EXTRAPOLATION; SCANNER; BEAM; ORIENTATION; ENTRANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-023-01251-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin (TM), for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin (TM) entry surface doses, relative to D-max, were (9.9 +/- 0.2)%, (10.1 +/- 0.3)%, (11.3 +/- 0.6)%, (12.9 +/- 1.0)%, and (13.4 +/- 1.0)% for 1 x 1 cm(2), 3 x 3 cm(2), 5 x 5 cm(2), 10 x 10 cm(2), and 22 x 22 cm(2) fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin (TM) measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 x 10 cm(2) field size using the MOSkin (TM) and 17.9% for the 22 x 22 cm(2) field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin (TM) detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 800
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac
    E. Patterson
    P. Stokes
    D. Cutajar
    A. Rosenfeld
    J. Baines
    P. Metcalfe
    M. Powers
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2023, 46 : 787 - 800
  • [2] Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Patterson, Elizabeth
    Powers, Marcus
    Metcalfe, Peter E.
    Cutajar, Dean
    Oborn, Bradley M.
    Baines, John A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (07):
  • [3] Surface and near-surface dose measurements at beam entry and exit in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Kim, Anthony
    Lim-Reinders, Stephanie
    Ahmad, Syed Bilal
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Keller, Brian M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (04)
  • [4] Performance of the HYPERSCINT scintillation dosimetry research platform for the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    Cote, Benjamin
    Foppen, Thomas
    de Vries, Wilfred
    Woodings, Simon
    Borman, Pim
    Lambert-Girard, Simon
    Therriault-Proulx, Francois
    Raaymakers, Bas
    Fast, Martin
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04)
  • [5] The Quality Assurance of a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Riis, Hans Lynggaard
    Chick, Joan
    Dunlop, Alex
    Tilly, David
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 120 - 128
  • [6] Relative dosimetry in a 1.5 T magnetic field: an MR-linac compatible prototype scanning water phantom
    Smit, K.
    Sjoholm, J.
    Kok, J. G. M.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (15) : 4099 - 4109
  • [7] Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR-linac system
    Scripes, Paola Godoy
    Subashi, Ergys
    Burleson, Sarah
    Liang, Jiayi
    Romesser, Paul
    Crane, Christopher
    Mechalakos, James
    Hunt, Margie
    Tyagi, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 144 - 152
  • [8] Performance of a cylindrical diode array for use in a 1.5 T MR-linac
    Houweling, A. C.
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    Wolthaus, J.
    Woodings, S.
    Kok, J. G. M.
    van Asselen, B.
    Smit, K.
    Bel, A.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (03) : N80 - N89
  • [9] Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    St-Aubin, Joel
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    Dunkerley, David A. P.
    Graves, Stephen A.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 160 - 172
  • [10] Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Zhang, Yan
    Yan, Shaojie
    Cui, Zhen
    Wang, Yungang
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Baosheng
    Quan, Hong
    Zhu, Jian
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (07) : 4027 - 4037