Does state ownership mitigate political risk in foreign direct investments? Evidence from subsidiary-level data for Norwegian MNEs

PurposeRecent international business research finds that state-owned multinational enterprises (SOMNEs) invest relatively more in politically risky host countries than do privately-owned multinational enterprises (MNEs). This study aims to investigate theoretically and empirically whether state ownership mitigates the impact of host-country political risk on subsidiary economic risk.Design/methodology/approachThe authors link theoretical arguments on state ownership to arguments from non-market strategy literature to outline mechanisms whereby state ownership can buffer subsidiaries from political risk, weakening the link between host-country political risk and earnings volatility in subsidiaries. Using a data set on Norwegian MNEs' foreign subsidiaries across almost two decades, the authors test this prediction using both matching methods and panel regressions.FindingsWhile standard panel regressions provide empirical support only for the infrastructure sector and for the highest political risk contexts, nearest-neighbour matching models - comparing only otherwise similar private- and SOMNE subsidiaries using the full sample - reveal more general support for the political risk mitigation hypothesis.Originality/valueThe study presents the first comprehensive analysis of whether state ownership can mitigate the effect of political risk on subsidiary economic risk.