Does shale gas development impact property values in Central Appalachia? A mixed methods critical exploration

被引:4
作者
Caretta, Martina Angela [1 ]
Emanuel, Ryan E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Human Geog Dept, Lund, Sweden
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Shale gas; Hydraulic fracturing; Pipelines; Property values; Environmental assessment; Qualitative methods; Central Appalachia; Federal energy regulatory commission; Environmental impact statements; Citation practices; HOUSING VALUES; FRACKING; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.exis.2023.101251
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increased shale gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing and its distribution through shale gas pipelines have brought about innumerable socioeconomic consequences, both tangibly and intangibly. Evidence remains un-clear on what are the impacts of shale gas developments on property values. By employing a mixed method approach, combining original data collected in the Marcellus Shale through interviews and a survey, and an analysis of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Rover Pipeline and the Mountain Valley Pipeline environmental impact statements, our data shows both an increase and decrease in property value in Central Appalachia. We demonstrate that shale gas pipelines buildout is made possible by skewed environmental impact statements that disregard peer-reviewed science and the experience of those living at the energy frontier. We contend that the inclusion of residents' lived experience will help to effectively evaluate the social and environmental sustain -ability of shale gas development. Finally, we argue that additional interdisciplinary original evidence is needed in order to improve environmental impact statements that effectively evaluate the viability and sustainability of energy distribution networks.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 70 条
[41]   The intensification of the water footprint of hydraulic fracturing [J].
Kondash, Andrew J. ;
Lauer, Nancy E. ;
Vengosh, Avner .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2018, 4 (08)
[42]  
Kopalek M., 2020, US NATURAL GAS PRODU
[43]   Different names for "natural gas" influence public perception of it [J].
Lacroix, Karine ;
Goldberg, Matthew H. ;
Gustafson, Abel ;
Rosenthal, Seth A. ;
Leiserowitz, Anthony .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 77
[44]  
LaFleur Cheryl, 2018, COMMISSIONER CA LAFL
[45]  
McElveen MA, 2017, Journal of Housing Research, V26, P27, DOI [10.1080/10835547.2017.12092126, 10.1080/10835547.2017.12092126, DOI 10.1080/10835547.2017.12092126]
[46]   Fracking Women: A Feminist Critical Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing in Pennsylvania [J].
McHenry, Kristen Abatsis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS, 2017, 10 (02) :79-104
[47]   Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points [J].
Mckay, David I. Armstrong ;
Staal, Arie ;
Abrams, Jesse F. ;
Winkelmann, Ricarda ;
Sakschewski, Boris ;
Loriani, Sina ;
Fetzer, Ingo ;
Cornell, Sarah E. ;
Rockstrom, Johan ;
Lenton, Timothy M. .
SCIENCE, 2022, 377 (6611) :1171-+
[48]   The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development [J].
Muehlenbachs, Lucija ;
Spiller, Elisheba ;
Timmins, Christopher .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (12) :3633-3659
[49]  
Pearson, 2017, HILLS AR GON FRAC SA
[50]  
Peltier James W., 2002, GUARDIAN PIPELINE ST