Soft-tissue reconstruction with pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after total or high sacrectomy for giant sacral tumor

被引:1
作者
Huang, Wending [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xianglin [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Weiluo [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Mo [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Zhengwang [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Tu [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Wangjun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Dongan Rd 270, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Giant sacral tumor; Sacrectomy; Soft-tissue defect; VRAM; Reconstruction; EN-BLOC RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; INFECTION; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The large soft -tissue defect after total or high sacrectomy for giant sacral tumor induces high incidence of wound complications. It remains a huge challenge to reconstruct the soft -tissue defect and achieve the preferred clinical outcome. Methods: A total of 27 patients undergoing one -stage total or high sacrectomy for giant sacral tumors between 2016 and 2021 in a tertiary university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Participants were divided into two groups. Thirteen patients underwent a pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reconstruction, whereas 14 patients underwent a conventional wound closure. Patient's clinical characteristics, surgical duration, postoperative complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Patients in VRAM and non-VRAM groups were similar in baseline characteristics. The mean tumor size was 12.85 cm (range: 10-17 cm) in VRAM group and 11.79 cm (range: 10-14.5 cm) in non-VRAM group (P = 0.139). The most common giant sacral tumor is chordoma. Patients in VRAM group had a shorter length of drainage (9.85 vs 17.14 days), postoperative time in bed (5.54 vs 17.14 days), and total length of stay (19.46 vs 33.36 days) compared with patients in non-VRAM group. Patients in the VRAM group had less wound infection and debri- dement than patients in non-VRAM group (15.4% vs 57.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the advantages of pedicled VRAM flap reconstruction of large soft -tissue defects after high or total sacrectomy using the anterior -posterior approach. This choice of reconstruction is better than direct wound closure in terms of wound infection, length of drainage, and total length of stay. (c) 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 180
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Flap reconstruction for sacrectomy defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Asaad, Malke ;
Rajesh, Aashish ;
Wahood, Waseem ;
Vyas, Krishna S. ;
Houdek, Matthew T. ;
Rose, Peter S. ;
Moran, Steven L. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (02) :255-268
[2]   Posterior-Only Approach for En Bloc Sacrectomy: Clinical Outcomes in 36 Consecutive Patients [J].
Clarke, Michelle J. ;
Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar ;
Bydon, Ali ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Hsieh, Patrick C. ;
Yassari, Reza ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul .
NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 71 (02) :357-364
[3]   Reconstruction of Extensive Defects From Posterior En Bloc Resection of Sacral Tumors With Human Acellular Dermal Matrix and Gluteus Maximus Myocutaneous Flaps [J].
Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar H. ;
Clarke, Michelle J. ;
Bydon, Ali ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Simmons, Oliver P. ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul .
NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 (06) :1240-1247
[4]   "En bloc" resection of sacral chordomas by combined anterior and posterior surgical approach: a monocentric retrospective review about 29 cases [J].
Dubory, Arnaud ;
Missenard, Gilles ;
Lambert, Benoit ;
Court, Charles .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (09) :1940-1948
[5]   En bloc resection of primary sacral tumors: classification of surgical approaches and outcome [J].
Fourney, DR ;
Rhines, LD ;
Hentschel, SJ ;
Skibber, JM ;
Wolinsky, JP ;
Weber, KL ;
Suki, D ;
Gallia, GL ;
Garonzik, I ;
Gokaslan, ZL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (02) :111-122
[6]   Operative management of sacral chordoma [J].
Fuchs, B ;
Dickey, ID ;
Yaszemski, MJ ;
Inwards, CY ;
Sim, FH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (10) :2211-2216
[7]   Recurrence or neurological loss? Resection mode selection for patients with large sacral chordoma: an analysis of prognostic factors and quality of life [J].
Gao, Xin ;
Jia, Qi ;
Cai, Xiaopan ;
Zhao, Chenglong ;
Yang, Jiaxiang ;
Dong, Lianfeng ;
Bai, Guangjian ;
Xin, Baoquan ;
Wan, Wei ;
Liu, Tielong ;
Xiao, Jianru .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2019, 161 (12) :2433-2441
[8]   Reconstructive Strategies for Partial Sacrectomy Defects Based on Surgical Outcomes [J].
Garvey, Patrick B. ;
Rhines, Laurence D. ;
Feng, Lei ;
Gu, Xuemin ;
Butler, Charles E. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (01) :190-199
[9]   Reconstruction of extensive partial or total sacrectomy defects with a transabdominal vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap [J].
Glatt, BS ;
Disa, JJ ;
Mehrara, BJ ;
Pusic, AL ;
Boland, P ;
Cordeiro, PG .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 56 (05) :526-530
[10]   Surgical Site Infection in Orthopaedic Oncology [J].
Gradl, Gertraud ;
de Witte, Pieter Bas ;
Evans, Brady T. ;
Hornicek, Francis ;
Raskin, Kevin ;
Ring, David .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (03) :223-230