A scoping review of scientific concepts concerning motor recovery after stroke as employed in clinical trials

被引:3
作者
Favetta, Martina [1 ]
Romano, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Vale, Nicola [3 ]
Cieslik, Blazej [4 ]
Federico, Sara [4 ]
Girolami, Alessia [5 ]
Mazzarotto, Deborah [6 ]
Pregnolato, Giorgia [4 ]
Righetti, Anna [3 ]
Salvalaggio, Silvia [7 ,8 ]
Castelli, Enrico [1 ]
Smania, Nicola [3 ]
Bargellesi, Stefano [9 ]
Kiper, Pawel [4 ]
Petrarca, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Neurorehabil Unit, Movement Anal & Robot Lab MARlab, IRCCS,Neurol Sci & Neurorehabil Area, Rome, Italy
[2] Ariel Univ, Dept Hlth Syst Management, Ariel, Israel
[3] Univ Verona, Neuromotor & Cognit Rehabil Res Ctr CRRNC, Dept Neurosci Biomed & Movement Sci, Verona, Italy
[4] IRCCS San Camillo Hosp, Lab Healthcare Innovat Technol, Venice, Italy
[5] Spondilos Lab Ctr Med & Riabilitaz, Dept Med, Pordenone, Italy
[6] Med Fis & Riabilitaz, Serv Transfus Med, ULSS 4 Veneto Orientale, Jesolo, Italy
[7] IRCCS San Camillo Hosp, Lab Computat Neuroimaging, Venice, Italy
[8] Univ Padua, Padova Neurosci Ctr, Padua, Italy
[9] Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Phys Med & Rehabil Unit, Venice, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
motor control; motor learning; stroke; neurological rehabilitation; motor disorders; treatment outcome; NEUROLOGICAL PRINCIPLES; REHABILITATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2023.1221656
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The scientific literature on poststroke rehabilitation is remarkably vast. Over the last decades, dozens of rehabilitation approaches have been investigated. However, sometimes it is challenging to trace new experimental interventions back to some of the known models of motor control and sensorimotor learning. This scoping review aimed to investigate motor control models' diffusion among the literature on motor recovery after stroke. We performed a literature search on Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases. The last search was conducted in September 2023. This scoping review included full-text articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals that provided rehabilitation interventions based on motor control or motor learning frameworks for at least one individual with stroke. For each study, we identified the theoretical framework the authors used to design the experimental treatment. To this aim, we used a previously proposed classification of the known models of motor control, dividing them into the following categories: neuroanatomy, robotics, self-organization, and ecological context. In total, 2,185 studies were originally considered in this scoping review. After the screening process, we included and analyzed 45 studies: 20 studies were randomized controlled trials, 12 were case series, 4 were case reports, 8 were observational longitudinal pilot studies, and 1 was an uncontrolled trial. Only 10 studies explicitly declared the reference theoretical model. Considering their classification, 21 studies referred to the robotics motor control model, 12 to the self-organization model, 8 to the neuroanatomy model, and 4 to the ecological model. Our results showed that most of the rehabilitative interventions purposed in stroke rehabilitation have no clear theoretical bases on motor control and motor learning models. We suggest this is an issue that deserves attention when designing new experimental interventions in stroke rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive
    Bays, PM
    Flanagan, JR
    Wolpert, DM
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (02) : 281 - 284
  • [2] Agreed Definitions and a Shared Vision for New Standards in Stroke Recovery Research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Taskforce
    Bernhardt, Julie
    Hayward, Kathryn S.
    Kwakkel, Gert
    Ward, Nick S.
    Wolf, Steven L.
    Borschmann, Karen
    Krakauer, John W.
    Boyd, Lara A.
    Carmichael, S. Thomas
    Corbett, Dale
    Cramer, Steven C.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2017, 31 (09) : 793 - 799
  • [3] Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke
    Cirstea, MC
    Levin, MF
    [J]. BRAIN, 2000, 123 : 940 - 953
  • [4] Submovement changes characterize generalization of motor recovery after stroke
    Dipietro, Laura
    Krebs, Hermano I.
    Fasoli, Susan E.
    Volpe, Bruce T.
    Hogan, Neville
    [J]. CORTEX, 2009, 45 (03) : 318 - 324
  • [5] Feldman A.G., 2015, Referent control of action and perception, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2736-4
  • [6] Referent control of anticipatory grip force during reaching in stroke: an experimental and modeling study
    Frenkel-Toledo, Silvi
    Yamanaka, Juri
    Friedman, Jason
    Feldman, Anatol G.
    Levin, Mindy F.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 237 (07) : 1655 - 1672
  • [7] Neurological Principles and Rehabilitation of Action Disorders: Computation, Anatomy, and Physiology (CAP) Model
    Frey, Scott H.
    Fogassi, Leonardo
    Grafton, Scott
    Picard, Nathalie
    Rothwell, John C.
    Schweighofer, Nicolas
    Corbetta, Maurizio
    Fitzpatrick, Susan M.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2011, 25 : 6S - 20S
  • [8] Overcoming Ignorance and Ineptitude in 21st Century Rehabilitation
    Jette, Alan M.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 97 (05): : 497 - 498
  • [9] Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage
    Kleim, Jeffrey A.
    Jones, Theresa A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (01): : S225 - S239
  • [10] Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
    Körding, KP
    Wolpert, DM
    [J]. NATURE, 2004, 427 (6971) : 244 - 247