Gamma-glutamyltransferase predicts macrovesicular liver graft steatosis - an analysis of discarded liver allografts in Finland

被引:1
作者
Savikko, Johanna [1 ]
Aberg, Fredrik [1 ]
Tukiainen, Eija [1 ]
Nordin, Arno [1 ]
Makisalo, Heikki [1 ]
Arola, Johanna [2 ]
Isoniemi, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Univ Hosp, Transplantat & Liver Surg Unit, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUH Diagnost Ctr, Dept Pathol, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Liver transplantation; cadaveric donor; liver biopsy; organ retrieval; liver graft evaluation; DONOR RISK INDEX; HEPATIC STEATOSIS; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; DOSE-RESPONSE; TRANSPLANTATION; FAT; OUTCOMES; MARKERS; GRADE; SERUM;
D O I
10.1080/00365521.2022.2137691
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Liver-transplantation activity is limited by the shortage of grafts. Donor-liver macrovesicular steatosis predisposes to ischemia-reperfusion injury and is associated with reduced graft survival. The increasing prevalence of fatty-liver disease underlines the importance of identifying macrovesicular steatosis in potential donor livers. We analyzed liver grafts discarded for transplantation, and particularly the role of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in predicting graft steatosis. Methods: One-hundred sixty rejected cadaveric-donor liver grafts were studied. Donor selection was based on clinical data, and macroscopic graft inspection. Discarded grafts were biopsied at procurement of non-liver organs. Results: The most common reasons for discarding the graft were abnormal liver tests, ultrasound-verified steatosis and history of harmful alcohol use. GGT correlated moderately with macrovesicular steatosis (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), but poorly with microvesicular steatosis (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). Increased correlation between GGT and macrovesicular steatosis was observed among alcohol abusers (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Area under the curve (AUC) of GGT for predicting >30% macrovesicular steatosis was 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.88), and for >60% steatosis, 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.90). The optimal GGT-cut off for detecting >30% and >60% macrovesicular steatosis were, respectively, 66 U/L (sensitivity 76% and specificity 68%) and 142 U/L (sensitivity 66% and specificity 83%). Among alcohol users, a GGT value >90 U/L showed 100% sensitivity for >60% macrovesicular steatosis. AUC for GGT in predicting fibrosis Stages 2-4 was 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.92, p < 0.001, optimal cut off 68, sensitivity 92%, specificity 61%). Conclusions: Abnormal liver values, steatosis and harmful alcohol use were the main reasons for discarding liver-graft offers in Finland. GGT proved useful in predicting moderate and severe liver graft macrovesicular steatosis.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 416
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Who is too healthy and who is too sick for liver transplantation: external validation of prognostic scores and survival-benefit estimation [J].
Aberg, Fredrik ;
Nordin, Arno ;
Makisalo, Heikki ;
Isoniemi, Helena .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 50 (09) :1144-1151
[2]  
ADAM R, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P1538
[3]   Grade of donor liver microvesicular steatosis does not affect the postoperative outcome after liver transplantation [J].
Andert, Anne ;
Ulmer, Tom Florian ;
Schoening, Wenzel ;
Kroy, Daniela ;
Hein, Marc ;
Alizai, Patrick Hamid ;
Heidenhain, Christoph ;
Neumann, Ulf ;
Schmeding, Maximilian .
HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 16 (06) :617-623
[4]   Presence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a large prospective primary care cohort [J].
Armstrong, Matthew J. ;
Houlihan, Diarmaid D. ;
Bentham, Louise ;
Shaw, Jean C. ;
Cramb, Robert ;
Olliff, Simon ;
Gill, Paramjit S. ;
Neuberger, James M. ;
Lilford, Richard J. ;
Newsome, Philip N. .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 (01) :234-240
[5]   The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population [J].
Bedogni, Giorgio ;
Bellentani, Stefano ;
Miglioli, Lucia ;
Masutti, Flora ;
Passalacqua, Marilena ;
Castiglione, Anna ;
Tiribelli, Claudio .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 6 (1)
[6]   The Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index in Liver Transplantation: ET-DRI [J].
Braat, A. E. ;
Blok, J. J. ;
Putter, H. ;
Adam, R. ;
Burroughs, A. K. ;
Rahmel, A. O. ;
Porte, R. J. ;
Rogiers, X. ;
Ringers, J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (10) :2789-2796
[7]   Donor Hepatic Steatosis and Outcome After Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review [J].
Chu, Michael J. J. ;
Dare, Anna J. ;
Phillips, Anthony R. J. ;
Bartlett, Adam S. J. R. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (09) :1713-1724
[8]   Does Donor Allograft Microsteatosis Matter? Comparison of Outcomes in Liver Transplantation With a Propensity-Matched Cohort [J].
Croome, Kristopher P. ;
Lee, David D. ;
Croome, Sarah ;
Nakhleh, Raouf E. ;
Senada, Peter Abader Sedki ;
Livingston, David ;
Yataco, Maria ;
Taner, C. Burcin .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (10) :1533-1540
[9]   The "Skinny" on Assessment and Utilization of Steatotic Liver Grafts: A Systematic Review [J].
Croome, Kristopher P. ;
Lee, David D. ;
Taner, C. Burcin .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (03) :488-499
[10]   Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index [J].
de Graaf, Esther L. ;
Kench, James ;
Dilworth, Pamela ;
Shackel, Nicholas A. ;
Strasser, Simone I. ;
Joseph, David ;
Pleass, Henry ;
Crawford, Michael ;
McCaughan, Geoff W. ;
Verran, Deborah J. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) :540-546