Does climate risk impact firms' ESG performance? Evidence from China

被引:36
作者
Chen, Yongtai [1 ]
Ren, Yi-Shuai [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Narayan, Seema [6 ]
Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh [7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Engn Audit, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Res Inst Digital Soc & Blockchain, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Auckland, Energy Ctr, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Melbourne, Australia
[7] UEH Univ, Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Coll Technol & Design, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG performance; Climate risk; Heterogeneity analysis; China; SUPPLY CHAINS; CORPORATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Owing to its devastating nature, climate risk has become one of the top concerns of the world community. The literature on the effects of climate risk on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance is scarce. Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2010 to 2019, this study aims to determine whether climate risk affects firms' ESG performance. The findings show that climate risk has a detrimental effect on the ESG performance of Chinese firms. A heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative effect of climate risk on firms' ESG performance is most pronounced for state-owned firms, growing and declining firms, and firms with more institutional investor shareholders. Furthermore, a mechanistic analysis shows that financing constraints, corporate diversification, and media attention enhance the negative effect of climate risk on ESG. In addition, after addressing several robustness checks and endogeneity issues, our conclusions remain valid. Thus, this study indicates the need to develop a comprehensive policy to achieve development goals by considering and valuing the impact of climate risk on firm's ESG performance.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 695
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   Financial development and the energy net-zero transformation potential [J].
Ding, Wangwang ;
Du, Juntao ;
Kazancoglu, Yigit ;
Mangla, Sachin Kumar ;
Song, Malin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 125
[12]   The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review [J].
Drempetic, Samuel ;
Klein, Christian ;
Zwergel, Bernhard .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 167 (02) :333-360
[13]   Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices?* [J].
Faccini, Renato ;
Matin, Rastin ;
Skiadopoulos, George .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2023, 155
[14]   Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance? [J].
Fang, Mingyue ;
Nie, Huihua ;
Shen, Xinyi .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 118
[15]   Socially responsible firms [J].
Ferrell, Allen ;
Liang, Hao ;
Renneboog, Luc .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 122 (03) :585-606
[16]   Reexamining the relationship between ESG and firm performance: Evidence from the role of Buddhism [J].
Fu, Panpan ;
Ren, Yi-Shuai ;
Tian, Yonggang ;
Narayan, Seema Wati ;
Weber, Olaf .
BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2024, 24 (01) :47-60
[17]   Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: a review and research agenda [J].
Ghadge, Abhijeet ;
Wurtmann, Hendrik ;
Seuring, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (01) :44-64
[18]   Corruption and economic growth: New empirical evidence [J].
Gruendler, Klaus ;
Potrafke, Niklas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 60
[19]   The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective [J].
He, Xu ;
Jing, Qinlei ;
Chen, Hao .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 344
[20]   Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility [J].
Hegde, Shantaram P. ;
Mishra, Dev R. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2019, 58 :226-246