Does climate risk impact firms' ESG performance? Evidence from China

被引:36
作者
Chen, Yongtai [1 ]
Ren, Yi-Shuai [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Narayan, Seema [6 ]
Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh [7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Engn Audit, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Res Inst Digital Soc & Blockchain, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Auckland, Energy Ctr, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Melbourne, Australia
[7] UEH Univ, Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Coll Technol & Design, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG performance; Climate risk; Heterogeneity analysis; China; SUPPLY CHAINS; CORPORATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Owing to its devastating nature, climate risk has become one of the top concerns of the world community. The literature on the effects of climate risk on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance is scarce. Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2010 to 2019, this study aims to determine whether climate risk affects firms' ESG performance. The findings show that climate risk has a detrimental effect on the ESG performance of Chinese firms. A heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative effect of climate risk on firms' ESG performance is most pronounced for state-owned firms, growing and declining firms, and firms with more institutional investor shareholders. Furthermore, a mechanistic analysis shows that financing constraints, corporate diversification, and media attention enhance the negative effect of climate risk on ESG. In addition, after addressing several robustness checks and endogeneity issues, our conclusions remain valid. Thus, this study indicates the need to develop a comprehensive policy to achieve development goals by considering and valuing the impact of climate risk on firm's ESG performance.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 695
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Do female CEOs matter for ESG scores? [J].
Aabo, Tom ;
Giorici, Iasmina Cristina .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 56
[2]   Does geopolitical risk matter for corporate investment? Evidence from emerging countries in Asia [J].
Anh-Tuan Le ;
Thao Phuong Tran .
JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 62
[3]   Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Attig, Najah ;
Boubakri, Narjess ;
El Ghoul, Sadok ;
Guedhami, Omrane .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 134 (02) :171-197
[4]   Real investment implications of employee stock option exercises [J].
Bens, DA ;
Nagar, V ;
Wong, MHF .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (02) :359-393
[5]  
Bolton P., 2020, Sustainable Investing: A Path to a New Horizon, P131
[6]   Climate risks and state-level stock market realized volatility [J].
Bonato, Matteo ;
Cepni, Oguzhan ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Pierdzioch, Christian .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2023, 66
[7]   Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China [J].
Boubaker, Sabri ;
Liu, Pei-Zhi ;
Ren, Yi-Shuai ;
Ma, Chao-Qun .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 91
[8]   Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? [J].
Cai, Ye ;
Pan, Carrie H. ;
Statman, Meir .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 41 :591-609
[9]   Renewable energy, credit portfolios and intermediation spread: Evidence from the banking sector in BRICS [J].
Chen, Zhonglu ;
Umar, Muhammad ;
Su, Chi-Wei ;
Mirza, Nawazish .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 208 :561-566
[10]   Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy [J].
Dafermos, Yannis ;
Nikolaidi, Maria ;
Galanis, Giorgos .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 152 :219-234