Common Method Bias: It's Bad, It's Complex, It's Widespread, and It's Not Easy to Fix

被引:278
作者
Podsakoff, Philip M. [1 ]
Podsakoff, Nathan P. [2 ]
Williams, Larry J. [3 ]
Huang, Chengquan [1 ]
Yang, Junhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Jerry S Rawls Coll Business, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
common method variance; same-source bias; Harman's single-factor test; marker variable technique; procedural and statistical remedies; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; SELF-REPORTED AFFECT; MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRICES; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORY; CROSS-SECTIONAL RESEARCH; EXTREME RESPONSE STYLE; METHOD VARIANCE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; MEASUREMENT ERROR;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite recognition of the harmful effects of common method bias (CMB), its causes, consequences, and remedies are still not well understood. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review our current knowledge of CMB and provide recommendations on how to control it.We organize our review into five main sections. First, we explain the harmful effects of CMB (why it is bad). Second, we discuss the complexity caused by the fact that there are multiple sources of CMB, several of which are likely to be present in any study. Third, we present evidence that the conditions under which CMB is likely to occur are relatively widespread, and fourth, we explain why CMB is not easy to fix. Finally, we identify several avenues for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 61
页数:45
相关论文
共 188 条