A reality check and a way forward for the global governance of artificial intelligence

被引:2
作者
Sepasspour, Rumtin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Study Existential Risk, Cambridge, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance Regnet, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Dept Prime Minister & Cabinet Australia, Barton, ACT, Australia
关键词
Artificial intelligence; global governance; policy; International Atomic Energy Agency; international relations; United Nations;
D O I
10.1080/00963402.2023.2245249
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Global governance of artificial intelligence (AI) must grapple with four monumental challenges. AI is a tough problem to govern given the speed, scale, and uncertainty of its progress. Various aspects of the AI problem require governing because of the range of benefits, risks, and impacts on other global issues. Multilateral efforts on AI are nascent, as is national-level policy. And the multilateral system is under immense pressure from institutional gridlock, fragmentation, and geopolitical competition. No one global governance model for AI is perfect, or desirable. Instead, policymakers must pursue several governance models, each starting in a targeted and focused manner before evolving. They must make clear what policy outcomes are being sought and which institutional functions are needed to reach those outcomes. AI governance within regional and multilateral issue-based groupings would commit nations to action and test models for governing AI globally. And national champions will be critical to success. This pragmatic yet optimistic path will allow humanity to maximize the benefits of artificial intelligence applications and distribute them as widely as possible, while mitigating harms and reducing risks as effectively as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 315
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Acharya A, 2016, WHY GOVT RETHINKING, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781316756829, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316756829]
  • [2] Ahmed Shamira., 2023, WHY G20 SHOULD LEAD
  • [3] Anderljung Markus, 2023, ARXIV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, G20 MIN STAT TRAD DI
  • [5] Create an IPCC-like body to harness benefits and combat harms of digital tech
    Bak-Coleman, Joseph
    Bergstrom, Carl T.
    Jacquet, Jennifer
    Mickens, James
    Tufekci, Zeynep
    Roberts, Timmons
    [J]. NATURE, 2023, 617 (7961) : 462 - 464
  • [6] Brundage M, 2018, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1802.07228, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1802.07228]
  • [7] Buchanan B., 2022, NEW FIRE WAR PEACE D, DOI [10.7551/mitpress/13940.001.0001, DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/13940.001.0001]
  • [8] What is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally?
    Butcher, James
    Beridze, Irakli
    [J]. RUSI JOURNAL, 2019, 164 (5-6) : 88 - 96
  • [9] Carlsmith J, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2206.13353
  • [10] Shaping AI's Future? China in Global AI Governance
    Cheng, Jing
    Zeng, Jinghan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2023, 32 (143) : 794 - 810