Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:6
作者
Li, Linjin [1 ]
Zhu, Jianlong [1 ]
Shao, Huan [2 ]
Huang, Laijian [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoting [2 ]
Bao, Wenshuo [1 ]
Sheng, Tao [2 ]
Chen, Dake [1 ]
He, Yanmei [2 ]
Song, Baolin [2 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Clin Inst Affiliated 3, Wenzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Urol, Jiaxing, Peoples R China
关键词
radiofrequency ablation; partial nephrectomy; recurrence; survival; renal cancer; CELL CARCINOMA; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SOLITARY KIDNEY; EAU GUIDELINES; MASSES; TUMORS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012897
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPartial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the most preferred nephron-sparing treatments for clinical T1 (cT1) renal cancer, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually used for patients who are poor surgical candidates. The long-term oncologic outcome of RFA vs. PN for cT1 renal cancer remains undetermined. This meta-analysis aims to compare the treatment efficacy and safety of RFA and PN for patients with cT1 renal cancer with long-term follow-up of at least 5 years. MethodThis meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Literature studies that had data on the comparison of the efficacy or safety of RFA vs. PN in treating cT1 renal cancer were searched in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January2000 to 1 May 2022. Only long-term studies with a median or mean follow-up of at least 5 years were included. The following measures of effect were pooled: odds ratio (OR) for recurrence and major complications; hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additional analyses, including sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias analysis, were also performed. ResultsA total of seven studies with 1,635 patients were finally included. The treatment efficacy of RFA was not different with PN in terms of cancer recurrence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.45-3.28), PFS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.75-2.11), and CSS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI, 0.41-3.95) as well as major complications (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.14) (P > 0.05 for all). RFA was a potential significant risk factor for OS (HR = 1.76, 95% CI, 1.32-2.34, P < 0.001). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias were observed. ConclusionThis is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the long-term oncological outcomes of cT1 renal cancer, and the results suggest that RFA has comparable therapeutic efficacy with PN. RFA is a nephron-sparing technique with favorable oncologic efficacy and safety and a good treatment alternative for cT1 renal cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Oncologic Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses [J].
Andrews, Jack R. ;
Atwell, Thomas ;
Schmit, Grant ;
Lohse, Christine M. ;
Kurup, A. Nicholas ;
Weisbrod, Adam ;
Callstrom, Matthew R. ;
Cheville, John C. ;
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Leibovich, Bradley C. ;
Thompson, R. Houston .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (02) :244-251
[2]   Management of Renal Masses with Laparoscopic-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Bird, Vincent G. ;
Carey, Robert I. ;
Ayyathurai, Rajinikanth ;
Bird, Victoria Y. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) :81-88
[3]   Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline [J].
Campbell, Steven ;
Uzzo, Robert G. ;
Allaf, Mohamad E. ;
Bass, Eric B. ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Chang, Anthony ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Davis, Brian J. ;
Derweesh, Ithaar H. ;
Giambarresi, Leo ;
Gervais, Debra A. ;
Hu, Susie L. ;
Lane, Brian R. ;
Leibovich, Bradley C. ;
Pierorazio, Philip M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :520-529
[4]  
Campbell SC, 2021, J UROLOGY, V206, P209, DOI 10.1097/JU.0000000000001912
[5]   Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: Evaluation, Management, and Follow-Up: AUA Guideline: Part I [J].
Campbell, Steven C. ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Karam, Jose A. ;
Souter, Lesley ;
Uzzo, Robert G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (02) :199-208
[6]   Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1a Renal-Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes Based on a Propensity Score Analysis [J].
Chang, Xiaofeng ;
Liu, Tieshi ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Ji, Changwei ;
Zhao, Xiaozhi ;
Wang, Wei ;
Guo, Hongqian .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (05) :518-525
[7]   Radio Frequency Ablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes [J].
Chang, Xiaofeng ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Liu, Tieshi ;
Ji, Changwei ;
Zhao, Xiaozhi ;
Yang, Rong ;
Yan, Xiang ;
Wang, Wei ;
Guo, Hongqian .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (02) :430-435
[8]   Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Finelli, Antonio ;
Ismaila, Nofisat ;
Bro, Bill ;
Durack, Jeremy ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Gill, Inderbir ;
Graham, David ;
Huang, William ;
Jewett, Michael A. S. ;
Latcha, Sheron ;
Lowrance, William ;
Rosner, Mitchell ;
Shayegan, Bobby ;
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Uzzo, Robert ;
Russo, Paul .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06) :668-+
[9]   Radiofrequency ablation in combination with embolization in metachronous recurrent renal cancer in solitary kidney after contralateral tumor nephrectomy [J].
Gebauer, Bernhard ;
Werk, Michael ;
Lopez-Haenninen, Enrique ;
Felix, Roland ;
Althaus, Peter .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 30 (04) :644-649
[10]  
Huang WC, 2006, LANCET ONCOL, V7, P735, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8