META-ANALYSIS OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF 3.0T MR DYNAMIC ENHANCEMENT IN PROSTATE CANCER AMONG FITNESS AND ATHLETIC PATIENTS

被引:1
作者
Chen, Cong [1 ]
Ren, Chunling [1 ]
Zheng, Zhiwei [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Mingzhou Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sect PET CT, Ningbo 315104, Peoples R China
[2] 923 Hosp Joint Logist Support Force, Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Dept Radiol, Beijing 530021, Peoples R China
来源
REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE MEDICINA Y CIENCIAS DE LA ACTIVIDAD FISICA Y DEL DEPORTE | 2023年 / 23卷 / 93期
关键词
Prostate cancer; 3.0 T MR dynamic enhancement; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnostic test; Meta-Analysis;
D O I
10.15366/rimcafd2023.93.002
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of 3.0T MR Dynamic enhancement in prostate cancer among fitness and athletic patients, aiming to offer insights for the selection of early diagnostic techniques in this specific population. Methods: This study conducted a comprehensive search in Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Proquest, and Chinese biomedical literature databases including Wanfang, Wipu, and CNKI, focusing on literature published until September 2022. The search was tailored to assess the value of 3.0T MR dynamic enhancement in diagnosing prostate cancer in fitness and athletic individuals. A meta -analysis was performed on the selected studies to calculate combined sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. Sensitivity -specific forest plots, SROC curves, and funnel plots were employed to evaluate publication bias. Results: The metaanalysis included seven studies, comprising a total of 516 subjects who were actively involved in fitness or athletic activities. Among these, 216 were true positive cases, 204 true negative, 43 false positive, and 53 false negative. The analysis revealed that the combined sensitivity of 3.0T MR Dynamic enhancement for prostate cancer diagnosis in this population was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.90), and the combined specificity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.88). The combined positive likelihood ratio was 4.91 (95% CI: 3.25, 7.16), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.26). The diagnostic odds ratio was 35.28 (95% CI: 16.57, 40.32), with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.92). No significant heterogeneity due to non -threshold effects (p>0.01) was observed, and a fixed effect model was applied. No publication bias was detected (P>0.05). Conclusion: 3.0T MR Dynamic enhancement demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of prostate cancer among fitness and athletic patients, indicating its significant diagnostic value in this specific demographic.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 29
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alexandre C. M.-A., 2018, Vascular & Endovascular Review, V1
[2]  
Alshawy Firas Ahrnad, 2019, FishTaxa-Journal of Fish Taxonomy, V4, P21
[3]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of subchondral bone marrow vascularization in an experimental osteoarthritis model: a major step towards clinical translation? [J].
Bauerle, T. ;
Roemer, F. W. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2021, 29 (05) :603-606
[4]   Screening for Prostate Cancer [J].
Carlsson, Sigrid, V ;
Vickers, Andrew J. .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 104 (06) :1051-+
[5]   Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Chen, Huiyou ;
Sutedjo, Janesya ;
Wang, Liwei ;
Yin, Xindao .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2016, 15 (04) :625-631
[6]   Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and diffusion-weighted image as predictors of lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer [J].
Choi, Bo Bae .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
[7]   Prostate cancer pathology: What has changed in the last 5 years [J].
Cimadamore, Alessia ;
Scarpelli, Marina ;
Raspollini, Maria Rosaria ;
Doria, Andrea ;
Galosi, Andrea Benedetto ;
Massari, Francesco ;
Di Nunno, Vincenzo ;
Cheng, Liang ;
Lopez-Beltran, Antonio ;
Montironi, Rodolfo .
UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2020, 87 (01) :3-10
[8]  
Dorff T. B., 2021, UROL ONCOL-SEMIN ORI
[9]   Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Pickles, MD ;
Turnbull, LW .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) :185-188
[10]  
Gordon E, 2019, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, V24, DOI [10.5912/jcb915, 10.5912/jcb915, DOI 10.5912/JCB915]