Randomized controlled trials in nursing conducted by Latin American research teams: A scoping review

被引:1
作者
Medina-Aedo, Melixa [1 ,8 ]
Segura-Carrillo, Cristian [2 ,3 ]
Torralba-Martinez, Elena [1 ]
Buitrago-Garcia, Diana [4 ,5 ]
Sola, Ivan [6 ,7 ]
Pardo-Hernandez, Hector [6 ,7 ]
Bonfill, Xavier [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Paediat Obstet & Gynaecol & Prevent Med & Pub, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Concepcion, Dept Trabajo Social, Concepcion, Chile
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Hosp Univ Mayor Mederi, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Biomed Res Inst St Pau IIB St Pau, Iberoamerican Cochrane Ctr, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Hosp Santa Creu St Pau Pavello 18 Planta baixa C S, Barcelona 08025, Spain
关键词
evidence-based; nursing; randomized controlled trials; scoping review; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; IDENTIFICATION; JOURNALS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.12943
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
IntroductioRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis. RCT identification remains challenging because of limitations in their indexation in major databases and potential language bias. Scientific production in Latin American nursing is steadily increasing, but little is known about its design or main features. We aimed to identify the extent of evidence from RCTs in nursing conducted by Latin American research teams and evaluate their main characteristics, including potential risk of bias.DesignScoping review with risk of bias assessment.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review including a comprehensive electronic search in five relevant databases. We completed a descriptive data analysis and a risk of bias assessment of eligible studies using Cochrane's guidance.ResultsWe identified 1784 references of which 47 were RCTs published in 40 journals. Twenty (42.6%) RCTs were published in journals in English. Chronic diseases were the most common health conditions studied (29.7%). Fifteen (31.9%) RCTs had a high risk of bias. Thirty (75%) journals were included in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) catalog and 5 (16.7%) were journals classified under nursing category. Twenty-one (52.5%) journals explicitly required CONSORT checklist recommendations for RCTs reporting.ConclusionPublication of RCTs in nursing by Latin American authors has increased. Most journals where RCTs are published are in English and not specific to nursing. Searches in journals of other disciplines may be necessary to facilitate identification of RCTs in nursing. CONSORT statements need to be actively promoted to facilitate rigorous methodology and reporting of RCTs.Clinical Relevance StatementThis study highlights the need for an increased research focus on RCTs in nursing in Latin America, and the importance of enhancing the reporting quality of these studies to support evidence-based nursing practice.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 340
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]  
Equipo MIAR, 2021, MATR INF AN REV
[12]   The Underappreciated and Misunderstood PICOT Question: A Critical Step in the EBP Process [J].
Ford, Lynn Gallagher ;
Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek .
WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2019,
[13]   Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Experimental Studies Published in Nursing Journals: Findings From a Scoping Review With Implications for Further Research [J].
Gonella, Silvia ;
Di Giulio, Paola ;
Palese, Alvisa ;
Dimonte, Valerio ;
Campagna, Sara .
WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2019, 16 (04) :299-309
[14]   Science, Technology, and Innovation: Nursing Responsibilities in Clinical Research [J].
Grady, Christine ;
Edgerly, Maureen .
NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 44 (04) :471-+
[15]   Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research [J].
Guo, Jia-Wen ;
Sward, Katherine A. ;
Beck, Susan L. ;
Staggers, Nancy .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2014, 63 (01) :26-35
[16]   Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Spanish Gynaecology and Obstetrics journals and risk of bias assessment of trials on assisted reproductive techniques [J].
Gutarra-Vilchez, Rosa B. ;
Pardo-Hernandez, Hector ;
Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid ;
Buitrago, Diana ;
Bonfill, Xavier .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 203 :5-11
[17]   Challenges and opportunities for cancer clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries [J].
Gyawali, Bishal ;
Bouche, Gauthier ;
Crisp, Nigel ;
Andre, Nicolas .
NATURE CANCER, 2020, 1 (02) :142-145
[18]  
Higgins JP., 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[19]   The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials [J].
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Jueni, Peter ;
Moher, David ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Weeks, Laura ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[20]   Funding source and the quality of reports of chronic wounds trials: 2004 to 2011 [J].
Hodgson, Robert ;
Allen, Richard ;
Broderick, Ellen ;
Bland, J. Martin ;
Dumville, Jo C. ;
Ashby, Rebecca ;
Bell-Syer, Sally ;
Foxlee, Ruth ;
Hall, Jill ;
Lamb, Karen ;
Madden, Mary ;
O'Meara, Susan ;
Stubbs, Nikki ;
Cullum, Nicky .
TRIALS, 2014, 15