Effects of high-intensity interval training versus sprint interval training during the second wave of COVID-19 lockdown on soccer players

This study aimed to compare the effects of two intervention programs (i.e., high-intensity interval training [HIIT] versus sprint interval training [SIT]) during the second wave of pandemic COVID-19 in semi-professional soccer players. Twenty-nine male soccer players were divided into two groups: HIIT (N: 16, age: 19.6 +/- 2.4 years, height: 1.8 +/- 0.5 m, weight: 71.5 +/- 4.6 kg, and body fat: 7.3 +/- 2.6%), who performed a HIIT protocol with progressive intensity and resistance training; SIT (N: 13, age: 23.5 +/- 5.1 years, height: 1.8 +/- 0.1 m, weight: 74.0 +/- 4.5 kg and body fat: 8.8 +/- 2.6%) that performed a SIT program combined with body weight circuit training. According to the instructions from World Health Organization of basic protective measures against COVID-19, each session did not exceed 60 min. Aerobic capacity (YoYo IR1) and countermovement jump (CMJ) height were measured before and after a 4-week intervention period. Aerobic variables (maximum oxygen uptake [(V) over dotO(2max)], velocity at (V) over dotO(2max) [v(V) over dotO(2max)] and CMJ significantly increased (p<0.001), while maximum heart rate [HRmax] decreased (p<0.01) following the HIIT intervention program. Conversely, values remained unchanged in the SIT group after the training. Post-evaluation between-group comparisons revealed that (V) over dotO(2max) was significantly higher in HIIT when compared to SIT (p<0.05). These results suggest that HIIT combined with resistance training, in different sessions, could lead to superior improvements in endurance and vertical jump ability in short time periods when compared to the combination of SIT and body-weighted strength training in semi-professional soccer players. (c) 2023 CONSELL CATALA DE L'ESPORT. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.