How channels of knowledge acquisition affect farmers' adoption of green agricultural technologies: evidence from Hubei province, China

被引:6
作者
Wang, Xuan [1 ]
Drabik, Dusan [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Junbiao [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wageningen Univ, Agr Econ & Rural Policy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Czech Univ Life Sci, Dept Trade & Accounting, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Rural Revitalizat Res Inst, Zhejiang Rural Revitalizat Res Inst, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Room 319, Expt Bldg, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Channels of knowledge acquisition; green agricultural technologies; negative binomial model; China; COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INFORMATION; CARBON; MANAGEMENT; INTENSIFICATION; FERTILIZER; WATER;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2023.2270254
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Farmers' adoption of green agricultural technologies (GATs) could reduce the negative environmental impacts of traditional agriculture in China. Despite the benefits of GATs, their adoption rate has not been high. While previous studies have examined the information and communication technologies that influence the adoption of GATs, most have selected only one of the GATs and have not distinguished between public and private channels of knowledge acquisition. In this paper, based on a sample of 732 rural households from Hubei Province, we used a negative binomial model to examine the role of knowledge acquisition channels on GATs adoption. Overall, we found that radio and the government (through its face-to-face channels) are positively associated with farmers' adoption of GATs; however, farmers adopted more GATs when they had acquired knowledge from the government than from radio. A possible explanation and a policy implication is that direct communication with farmers and practical demonstration of the benefits of GATs are preferred to passive reception of information.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1962, DIFFUSION INNOVATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, P3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Handbook of Agricultural Economics, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S15740072(06)030441, 10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1]
[4]   Creating incentives for the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in developing countries: The role of soil carbon sequestration [J].
Antle, JM ;
Diagana, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (05) :1178-1184
[5]  
Awuni J. A., 2018, Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V21, P48
[6]   The perceived effectiveness of agricultural technology transfer methods: Evidence from rice farmers in Northern Ghana [J].
Azumah, Shaibu Baanni ;
Donkoh, Samuel A. ;
Awuni, Joseph A. .
COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2018, 4 (01)
[7]   Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods [J].
Barbosa, Guilherme Lages ;
Gadelha, Francisca Daiane Almeida ;
Kublik, Natalya ;
Proctor, Alan ;
Reichelm, Lucas ;
Weissinger, Emily ;
Wohlleb, Gregory M. ;
Halden, Rolf U. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (06) :6879-6891
[8]   Food for Hope: The Role of Personal Resources in Farmers' Adoption of Green Technology [J].
Bukchin, Shira ;
Kerret, Dorit .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
[9]   Climate technology transfer in BRI era: needs, priorities, and barriers from receivers' perspective [J].
Chen, Minpeng ;
Zhang, Lei ;
Teng, Fei ;
Dai, Jingjing ;
Li, Zhuang ;
Wang, Ziqi ;
Li, Yuting .
ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 6 (01) :1-12
[10]  
Chinese National Bureau of Statistics, 2021, About us