Special Education and Meritocratic Inclusion

被引:7
作者
Stanczak, Arnaud [1 ]
Jury, Mickael [1 ,4 ]
Aelenei, Cristina [2 ]
Pironom, Julie [1 ]
Toczek-Capelle, Marie-Christine [1 ]
Rohmer, Odile [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, ACTe, Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] Univ Paris Cite, Lab Psychol Sociale, Boulogne Billancourt, France
[3] Univ Strasbourg, LPC, Strasbourg, France
[4] Univ Clermont Auvergne, Lab Acte, 36 Ave Jean Jaures CS 20001, F-63407 Chamalieres, France
关键词
inclusive education; meritocracy; special educational needs; backlash; equity; SOCIAL-CLASS; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; STUDENTS; BACKLASH; DISABILITIES; INEQUALITY; ATTITUDES; BARRIERS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1177/08959048231153606
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this theoretical article we present our hypothesis on the incompatibility of the inclusive education policy toward students with special educational needs with the meritocratic principle of education. If considering and recognizing the needs of these students is necessary to achieve a successful inclusive environment, we propose that this goal cannot be achieved within current educational systems driven by a meritocratic ideology. We base our rationale on social psychology theories such as system justification and backlash to argue that such incompatibility is particularly visible during the evaluation process. Finally, if we provide some incentives toward greater inclusion while considering the diverse contradictions such inclusivity generates, we also invite researchers to further empirically examine these contradictions in order to guide policy makers within their choices.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 103
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Editorial: the Salamanca Statement: 25 years on [J].
Ainscow, Mel ;
Slee, Roger ;
Best, Marnie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2019, 23 (7-8) :671-676
[2]   International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: a systematic review [J].
Amor, Antonio M. ;
Hagiwara, Mayumi ;
Shogren, Karrie A. ;
Thompson, James R. ;
Verdugo, Miguel Angel ;
Burke, Kathryn M. ;
Aguayo, Virginia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2019, 23 (12) :1277-1295
[3]   Patterns of inclusive education through the practice of student teachers [J].
Angelides, Panayiotis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2008, 12 (03) :317-329
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PISA 2018 RESULTS VO, VII, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264251724-EN, 10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en, DOI 10.1787/B5FD1B8F-EN]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SALAMANCA STATEMENT
[6]  
Anthoula K., 2020, Prospects, V49, P135, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11125-020-09500-2, 10.1007/s11125-020-09500-2]
[7]   Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education [J].
Apple, MW .
COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2001, 37 (04) :409-423
[8]   Reinventing 'inclusion': New Labour and the cultural politics of special education [J].
Armstrong, D .
OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2005, 31 (01) :135-151
[9]   The Function of Selection of Assessment Leads Evaluators to Artificially Create the Social Class Achievement Gap [J].
Autin, Frederique ;
Batruch, Anatolia ;
Butera, Fabrizio .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 111 (04) :717-735
[10]   Social justice in education: how the function of selection in educational institutions predicts support for (non)egalitarian assessment practices [J].
Autin, Frederique ;
Batruch, Anatolia ;
Butera, Fabrizio .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6