The feasibility and safety of combining atrial septal defect/patent foramen ovale and left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Song, Yi [1 ]
Xing, Hang [2 ]
Koch, Peter David [3 ]
Li, Xiaofei [4 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Ultrasound, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Surg, Providence, RI USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Syst Biol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Warren Alpert Med Sch,Dept Med,Div Cardiol, Providence, RI USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
atrial appendage closure; occlusion; atrial septal closure; patent foramen ovale closure; atrial fibrillation; staged; TRANSCATHETER CLOSURE; PRIMARY PREVENTION; STROKE PREVENTION; FOLLOW-UP; FIBRILLATION; OCCLUSION; WATCHMAN; DEVICE; DEFECT; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.1080257
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Atrial Septal Defect/Patent Foramen Ovale (ASD/PFO) occlusion is performed to prevent paradoxical embolism and reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is used as an alternative to medical therapy of non-valvular atrial fibrillation for prevention of stroke. Multiple studies have examined performing LAA and ASD/PFO occlusion. However, the feasibility and safety of combined occlusion of the left atrial appendage and ASD/PFO are not clear, furthermore, these studies are limited by their small sample sizes and retrospective analysis. In this study, we aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the feasibility and safety of combining left atrial appendage and ASD/PFO closure.Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane Library, Embase, and WanFang database were searched up to April 2022 to identify peer-reviewed human studies on assessing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of combining left atrial appendage and ASD/PFO closure. The primary outcome was calculated: procedural feasibility outcome and procedural safety outcome.Results: A total of 10 articles, including 340 patients from multiple countries, were included in the analysis. The principal findings of our study are: compared with single LAA closure, (i) combining PFO/ASD occlusion and LAA closure had similar procedural success proportion (98.43%, 95% CI: 96.67-100.00%), (ii) similar safety event incidences developed (1.67%, 95% CI: 0.24-3.92%), subgroup analyzed safety event incidences in death was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.33%), cardiac tamponade was 0.87% (95% CI: 0.00-2.77%), device embolization was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.60%), major bleeding was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.33%), stroke was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00-0.02%).Conclusion: Although this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of combining closure of PFO/ASD and LAA, further studies of sufficient sample size, long-term follow-up, and rigor endpoint criteria are yet needed to fully evaluate this combination procedure for its role in clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[41]   Long-term safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous LAA and PFO/ASD closure: a single-center experience (LAAC combined PFO/ASD closure) [J].
Yu, Jiangtao ;
Liu, Xiaoxia ;
Zhou, Junling ;
Xue, Xin ;
Muenzel, Manuela ;
Schulze, P. Christian ;
Moebius-Winkler, Sven ;
Keil, Thorsten ;
Meng, Zhaohui ;
Tang, Shaoyong .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (05) :429-435
[42]   "One-stop shop": safety and efficacy of combining atrial septal defect occlusion and left atrial appendage closure for patients with atrial septal defect and atrial fibrillation [J].
Zhang, Zhi-hui ;
Yao, Qing ;
Huang, Hai-yun ;
Zhu, Ping ;
Xu, Xiang ;
Song, Zhi-Yuan ;
Li, Hua-kang .
BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2020, 20 (01)