共 48 条
Adalimumab exhibits superiority over etanercept in terms of a numerically higher response rate and equivalent adverse events: A real-world finding
被引:1
作者:
Yu, Zhe
[1
]
Gao, Ling
[1
]
Zang, Yinshan
[1
]
Cheng, Lu
[1
]
Gao, Wenjia
[1
]
Xu, Yan
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suqian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Suqian, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suqian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, 120 Suzhi Rd, Suqian 223800, Peoples R China
关键词:
adalimumab;
efficacy;
etanercept;
rheumatoid arthritis;
safety;
RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS;
EFFICACY;
SAFETY;
D O I:
10.1002/iid3.1166
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
IntroductionAdalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) are the most commonly applied biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in China; however, the evidence regarding their superiority is controversial. In addition, in real-world clinical settings, many factors may affect the application of these agents, such as dosage and administration period. Therefore, the present real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and ETN treatment in RA patients via the propensity score matching method.MethodsIn total, 105 RA patients receiving ADA (n = 66) or ETN (n = 39) were reviewed in this retrospective study. The propensity score matching method was used to eliminate discrepancies in baseline features. Clinical response, low disease activity (LDA), and remission were evaluated based on the DAS28.ResultsBefore propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA yielded higher rates of clinical response at W24 (97.0% vs. 84.6%, p = .021), LDA at W12 (78.8% vs. 51.3%, p = .003), and remission at W24 (75.8% vs. 46.2%, p = .002). After propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA only achieved a higher rate of clinical response at W24 (96.3% vs. 77.8%, p = .043), whereas the rates of LDA and remission were not different between ADA and ETN treatments at any time point (all p > .05). In addition, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the ADA and ETN treatments (all p > .05).ConclusionADA shows superiority over ETN in terms of a numerically greater response rate and equivalent adverse events. Before propensity-score matching, adalimumab achieves higher rates of clinical response, low disease activity, and remission than etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients. After matching, adalimumab still realizes a higher rate of clinical response than etanercept to some extent with equivalent safety in rheumatoid arthritis patients image
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文