Adalimumab exhibits superiority over etanercept in terms of a numerically higher response rate and equivalent adverse events: A real-world finding

被引:1
作者
Yu, Zhe [1 ]
Gao, Ling [1 ]
Zang, Yinshan [1 ]
Cheng, Lu [1 ]
Gao, Wenjia [1 ]
Xu, Yan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suqian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Suqian, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suqian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, 120 Suzhi Rd, Suqian 223800, Peoples R China
关键词
adalimumab; efficacy; etanercept; rheumatoid arthritis; safety; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/iid3.1166
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
IntroductionAdalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) are the most commonly applied biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in China; however, the evidence regarding their superiority is controversial. In addition, in real-world clinical settings, many factors may affect the application of these agents, such as dosage and administration period. Therefore, the present real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and ETN treatment in RA patients via the propensity score matching method.MethodsIn total, 105 RA patients receiving ADA (n = 66) or ETN (n = 39) were reviewed in this retrospective study. The propensity score matching method was used to eliminate discrepancies in baseline features. Clinical response, low disease activity (LDA), and remission were evaluated based on the DAS28.ResultsBefore propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA yielded higher rates of clinical response at W24 (97.0% vs. 84.6%, p = .021), LDA at W12 (78.8% vs. 51.3%, p = .003), and remission at W24 (75.8% vs. 46.2%, p = .002). After propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA only achieved a higher rate of clinical response at W24 (96.3% vs. 77.8%, p = .043), whereas the rates of LDA and remission were not different between ADA and ETN treatments at any time point (all p > .05). In addition, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the ADA and ETN treatments (all p > .05).ConclusionADA shows superiority over ETN in terms of a numerically greater response rate and equivalent adverse events. Before propensity-score matching, adalimumab achieves higher rates of clinical response, low disease activity, and remission than etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients. After matching, adalimumab still realizes a higher rate of clinical response than etanercept to some extent with equivalent safety in rheumatoid arthritis patients image
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Immunogenicity of TNF-Inhibitors [J].
Atiqi, Sadaf ;
Hooijberg, Femke ;
Loeff, Floris C. ;
Rispens, Theo ;
Wolbink, Gerrit J. .
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 11
[2]   Efficacy and Treatment Costs of Monotherapy with bDMARDs in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients Intolerant to or Inappropriate to Continue Treatment with Methotrexate [J].
Batticciotto, Alberto ;
Ravasio, Roberto ;
Riva, Marta ;
Sarzi-Puttini, Piercarlo .
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2016, 33 (08) :1360-1373
[3]   Window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis - definitions and supporting evidence: from old to new perspectives [J].
Burgers, Leonie E. ;
Raza, Karim ;
van der Helm-van Mil, Annette H. .
RMD OPEN, 2019, 5 (01) :V
[4]   Adalimumab alone and in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice:: the Research in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (ReAct) trial [J].
Burmester, Gerd R. ;
Mariette, Xavier ;
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio ;
Monteagudo-Saez, Indalecio ;
Malaise, Michel ;
Tzioufas, Athanasios G. ;
Bijlsma, Johannes W. J. ;
Unnebrink, Kristina ;
Kary, Sonja ;
Kupper, Hartmut .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2007, 66 (06) :732-739
[5]   Efficacy and safety of original and biosimilar etanercept (SB4) in active rheumatoid arthritis - A comparison in a real-world national cohort [J].
Codreanu, Catalin ;
Popescu, Claudiu C. ;
Mogosan, Corina ;
Enache, Luminita ;
Daia, Sanziana ;
Ionescu, Ruxandra ;
Opris-Belinski, Daniela .
BIOLOGICALS, 2019, 62 :27-32
[6]   Rheumatoid Arthritis Early Diagnosis and Treatment [J].
Cush, John J. .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 105 (02) :355-365
[7]   Rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Diaz-Gonzalez, Federico ;
Hernandez-Hernandeza, Maria V. .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2023, 161 (12) :533-542
[8]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of tofacitinib compared with adalimumab and etanercept in the treatment of severe active rheumatoid arthritis; Iranian experience [J].
Fatemi, Behzad ;
Rezaei, Soheila ;
Taheri, Saeed ;
Peiravian, Farzad .
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) :775-784
[9]   Effectiveness of Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Real-World Data from the German Non-interventional Study ADEQUATE with Focus on Treat-to-Target and Patient-Reported Outcomes [J].
Feist, Eugen ;
Baraliakos, Xenofon ;
Behrens, Frank ;
Thaci, Diamant ;
Klopsch, Thilo ;
Plenske, Anja ;
Blindzellner, Lisa K. ;
Klaus, Pascal ;
Meng, Thomas ;
Loeschmann, Peter-Andreas .
RHEUMATOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2022, 9 (02) :621-635
[10]   Direct and indirect comparison of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and golimumab in psoriatic arthritis [J].
Fenix-Caballero, S. ;
Alegre-del Rey, E. J. ;
Castano-Lara, R. ;
Puigventos-Latorre, F. ;
Borrero-Rubio, J. M. ;
Lopez-Vallejo, J. F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 38 (04) :286-293