Implementing systematic melanoma risk assessment and risk-tailored surveillance in a skin cancer focussed dermatology clinic: A qualitative study of feasibility and acceptability to patients and clinic staff

被引:1
作者
Smith, A. L. [1 ]
Smit, A. K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Laginha, B. I. [4 ]
Singh, N. [1 ,4 ]
Gallo, B. [2 ]
Martin, L. [2 ,5 ]
Cust, A. E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, joint venture Canc Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Melanoma Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, Room 111B,Edward Ford Bldg A27, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
early detection; implementation science; melanoma; risk assessment; screening; skin cancer; surveillance;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6976
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundInternational bodies recommend that melanoma risk assessment should be integrated into skin cancer care provision, but evidence to support implementation is lacking.AimTo explore the acceptability and feasibility of implementing personalised melanoma risk assessment and tailored patient education and skin surveillance within routine clinical care.MethodsThis prospective qualitative implementation study was informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Personalised, systematic melanoma risk assessment was implemented in the dermatology clinic at the Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia February-May 2021. Pre- and post-implementation observations and semi-structured interviews with patients and staff were conducted (September 2020-March 2021). Observational notes and interview transcript data were analysed thematically using the TFA as a classifying framework.ResultsA total of 37 h of observations were made, and 29 patients and 12 clinic staff were interviewed. We found that the delivery of personalised melanoma risk estimates did not impact on patient flow through the clinic. Dermatologists reported that the personalised risk information enhanced their confidence in assessing patient risk and recommending tailored surveillance schedules. Most patients reported that the risk assessment and tailored information were a beneficial addition to their care. Among patients whose risk deviated from their expectations, some reported feeling worried, confused or mistrust in the risk information, including those at lower risk who were recommended to decrease surveillance frequency.ConclusionsIt is feasible and acceptable to patients and clinic staff to calculate and deliver personalised melanoma risk information and tailored surveillance as part of routine clinical care within dermatology clinics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs [J].
Anandasivam, Balakumar ;
Tam, Chun Wah Michael ;
McGeechan, Kevin ;
Price, Karen ;
McLean, Katrina ;
Tracy, Marguerite ;
Hall, John ;
Knight, Andrew ;
Vuong, Kylie .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (723) :E737-E746
[2]   Global Burden of Cutaneous Melanoma in 2020 and Projections to 2040 [J].
Arnold, Melina ;
Singh, Deependra ;
Laversanne, Mathieu ;
Vignat, Jerome ;
Vaccarella, Salvatore ;
Meheus, Filip ;
Cust, Anne E. ;
de Vries, Esther ;
Whiteman, David C. ;
Bray, Freddie .
JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 158 (05) :495-503
[3]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[4]  
Braun V., 2013, Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide For Beginners
[5]   Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) :589-597
[6]   The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) [J].
Buus, Niels ;
Perron, Amelie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 102
[7]   The perception gap: how the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening are understood in information material focusing on informed choice [J].
Byskov Petersen, Gabriela ;
Sadolin Damhus, Christina ;
Ryborg Jonsson, Alexandra Brandt ;
Brodersen, John .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2020, 22 (02) :177-196
[8]   A risk prediction model for the development of subsequent primary melanoma in a population-based cohort [J].
Cust, A. E. ;
Badcock, C. ;
Smith, J. ;
Thomas, N. E. ;
Haydu, L. E. ;
Armstrong, B. K. ;
Law, M. H. ;
Thompson, J. F. ;
Kanetsky, P. A. ;
Begg, C. B. ;
Shi, Y. ;
Kricker, A. ;
Orlow, I. ;
Sharma, A. ;
Yoo, S. ;
Leong, S. F. ;
Berwick, M. ;
Ollila, D. W. ;
Lo, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 182 (05) :1148-1157
[9]   Acceptability of risk-stratified population screening across cancer types: Qualitative interviews with the Australian public [J].
Dunlop, Kate ;
Rankin, Nicole M. ;
Smit, Amelia K. ;
Salgado, Zofia ;
Newson, Ainsley J. ;
Keogh, Louise ;
Cust, Anne E. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (04) :1326-1336
[10]   Views of the Australian public on the delivery of risk-stratified cancer screening in the population: a qualitative study [J].
Dunlop, Kate L. A. ;
Rankin, Nicole M. ;
Smit, Amelia K. ;
Newson, Ainsley J. ;
Keogh, Louise A. ;
Cust, Anne E. .
PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2023, 33 (02)