A deep learning framework for personalised dynamic diagnosis of graft fibrosis after liver transplantation: a retrospective, single Canadian centre, longitudinal study

被引:19
作者
Azhie, Amirhossein [1 ]
Sharma, Divya [2 ]
Sheth, Priya [1 ]
Qazi-Arisar, Fakhar Ali [1 ,5 ,7 ,8 ]
Zaya, Rita [1 ]
Naghibzadeh, Maryam [1 ]
Duan, Kai [3 ]
Fischer, Sandra [3 ]
Patel, Keyur [4 ,5 ]
Tsien, Cynthia [1 ,5 ]
Selzner, Nazia [1 ,5 ]
Lilly, Leslie [1 ,5 ]
Jaeckel, Elmar [1 ,5 ]
Xu, Wei [2 ,6 ]
Bhat, Mamatha [1 ,5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Ajmera Transplant Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Biostat, Princess Margaret Canc, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Ctr Liver Dis, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat Div, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Natl Inst Liver & Gastrointestinal Dis, Karachi, Pakistan
[9] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
关键词
SIMPLE NONINVASIVE INDEX; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00068-7
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recurrent graft fibrosis after liver transplantation can threaten both graft and patient survival. Therefore, early detection of fibrosis is essential to avoid disease progression and the need for retransplantation. Non-invasive blood-based biomarkers of fibrosis are limited by moderate accuracy and high cost. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of machine learning algorithms in detecting graft fibrosis using longitudinal clinical and laboratory data. Methods In this retrospective, longitudinal study, we trained machine learning algorithms, including our novel weighted long short-term memory (LSTM) model, to predict the risk of significant fibrosis using follow-up data from 1893 adults who had a liver transplantation between Feb 1, 1987, and Dec 30, 2019, with at least one liver biopsy post transplantation. Liver biopsy samples with indefinitive fibrosis stage and those from patients with multiple transplantations were excluded. Longitudinal clinical variables were collected from transplantation to the date of last available liver biopsy. Deep learning models were trained on 70% of the patients as the training set and 30% of the patients as the test set. The algorithms were also separately tested on longitudinal data from patients in a subgroup of patients (n=149) who had transient elastography within 1 year before or after the date of liver biopsy. Weighted LSTM model performance for diagnosing significant fibrosis was compared against LSTM, other deep learning models (recurrent neural network and temporal convolutional network), and machine learning models (Random Forest, Support vector machines, Logistic regression, Lasso regression, and Ridge regression) and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and transient elastography. Findings 1893 people who had a liver transplantation (1261 [67%] men and 632 [33%] women) with at least one liver biopsy between Jan 1, 1992, and June 30, 2020, were included in the study (591 [31%] cases and 1302 [69%] controls). The median age at liver transplantation was 53 center dot 7 years (IQR 47 center dot 3-59 center dot 0) for cases and 55 center dot 3 years (48 center dot 0 to 61 center dot 2) for controls. The median time interval between transplant and liver biopsy was 21 months (5 to 71). The weighted LSTM model (area under the curve 0 center dot 798 [95% CI 0 center dot 790 to 0 center dot 810]) consistently outperformed other methods, including unweighted LSTM (0 center dot 761 [0 center dot 750 to 0 center dot 769]; p=0 center dot 031) Recurrent Neural Network (0 center dot 736 [0 center dot 721 to 0 center dot 744]), Temporal Convolutional Networks (0 center dot 700 [0 center dot 662 to 0 center dot 747], and Random Forest 0 center dot 679 [0 center dot 652 to 0 center dot 707]), FIB-4 (0 center dot 650 [0 center dot 636 to 0 center dot 663]) and APRI (0 center dot 682 [0 center dot 671 to 0 center dot 694]) when diagnosing F2 or worse stage fibrosis. In a subgroup of patients with transient elastography results, weighted LSTM was not significantly better at detecting fibrosis (>= F2; 0 center dot 705 [0 center dot 687 to 0 center dot 724]) than transient elastography (0 center dot 685 [0 center dot 662 to 0 center dot 704]). The top ten variables predictive for significant fibrosis were recipient age, primary indication for transplantation, donor age, and longitudinal data for creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, platelets, white blood cell count, and weight. Interpretation Deep learning algorithms, particularly weighted LSTM, outperform other routinely used non-invasive modalities and could help with the earlier diagnosis of graft fibrosis using longitudinal clinical and laboratory variables. The list of most important predictive variables for the development of fibrosis will enable clinicians to modify their management accordingly to prevent onset of graft cirrhosis.
引用
收藏
页码:e458 / e466
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BEDOSSA P, 1994, HEPATOLOGY, V20, P15
[2]   ARFI, FibroScan®, ELF, and their combinations in the assessment of liver fibrosis: A prospective study [J].
Crespo, Gonzalo ;
Fernandez-Varo, Guillermo ;
Marino, Zoe ;
Casals, Gregori ;
Miquel, Rosa ;
Martinez, Stella M. ;
Gilabert, Rosa ;
Forns, Xavier ;
Jimenez, Wladimiro ;
Navasa, Miquel .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 57 (02) :281-287
[3]   Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Decharatanachart, Pakanat ;
Chaiteerakij, Roongruedee ;
Tiyarattanachai, Thodsawit ;
Treeprasertsuk, Sombat .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]   The use of transient elastography and non-invasive serum markers of fibrosis in pediatric liver transplant recipients [J].
Goldschmidt, Imeke ;
Stieghorst, Henrik ;
Munteanu, Mona ;
Poynard, Thierry ;
Schlue, Jerome ;
Streckenbach, Carolin ;
Baumann, Ulrich .
PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 17 (06) :525-534
[6]   Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action Segmentation [J].
Lea, Colin ;
Vidal, Rene ;
Reiter, Austin ;
Hager, Gregory D. .
COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2016 WORKSHOPS, PT III, 2016, 9915 :47-54
[7]   Acute Rejection Increases Risk of Graft Failure and Death in Recent Liver Transplant Recipients [J].
Levitsky, Josh ;
Goldberg, David ;
Smith, Abigail R. ;
Mansfield, Sarah A. ;
Gillespie, Brenda W. ;
Merion, Robert M. ;
Lok, Anna S. F. ;
Levy, Gary ;
Kulik, Laura ;
Abecassis, Michael ;
Shaked, Abraham .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (04) :584-+
[8]   Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study [J].
Loupy, Alexandre ;
Aubert, Olivier ;
Orandi, Babak J. ;
Naesens, Maarten ;
Bouatou, Yassine ;
Raynaud, Marc ;
Divard, Gillian ;
Jackson, Annette M. ;
Viglietti, Denis ;
Giral, Magali ;
Kamar, Nassim ;
Thaunat, Olivier ;
Morelon, Emmanuel ;
Delahousse, Michel ;
Kuypers, Dirk ;
Hertig, Alexandre ;
Rondeau, Eric ;
Bailly, Elodie ;
Eskandary, Farsad ;
Bohmig, Georg ;
Gupta, Gaurav ;
Glotz, Denis ;
Legendre, Christophe ;
Montgomery, Robert A. ;
Stegall, Mark D. ;
Empana, Jean-Philippe ;
Jouven, Xavier ;
Segev, Dorry L. ;
Lefaucheur, Carmen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 366
[9]  
Mandic D., 2001, ADAPT LEARN SYST SIG
[10]   Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology [J].
Neuberger, James ;
Patel, Jai ;
Caldwell, Helen ;
Davies, Susan ;
Hebditch, Vanessa ;
Hollywood, Coral ;
Hubscher, Stefan ;
Karkhanis, Salil ;
Lester, Will ;
Roslund, Nicholas ;
West, Rebecca ;
Wyatt, Judith I. ;
Heydtmann, Mathis .
GUT, 2020, 69 (08) :1382-1403