Laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: The choice and the future

被引：0

作者：

Alvarez, Francisco Espin ^{[1
]}

Garcia-Domingo, Maria Isabel ^{[2
]}

Perez, Manel Cremades ^{[1
]}

Aranda, Fernando Pardo ^{[1
]}

Pineiro, Laura Vidal ^{[1
]}

Fonollosa, Eric Herrero ^{[2
]}

Lopez, Jordi Navines ^{[1
]}

Pinedo, Alba Zarate ^{[1
]}

Camps-Lasa, Judith ^{[2
]}

Andorra, Esteban Cugat ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Univ Germans Trias i Pujol, Unidad Cirugia Hepatobiliopancreat, Badalona, Spain

[2] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Mutua Terrassa, Unidad Cirugia Hepatobiliopancrat, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

来源：

CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2023年 / 101卷 / 11期

关键词：

Surgery; Pancreas; Laparoscopic; Robotic surgical procedures; Pancreatic neoplasms; Minimally invasive surgery; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; OUTCOMES; RESECTION; IMPACT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ciresp.2023.02.026

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Introduction: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is currently well established as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure, using either a laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approach. Methods: Out of 83 DP performed between January 2018 and March 2022, 57 cases (68.7%) were performed using MIS: 35 LDP and 22 RDP (da Vinci Xi). We have assessed the experience with the 2 techniques and analyzed the value of the robotic approach. Cases of conversion have been examined in detail. Results: The mean operative times for LDP and RDP were 201.2 (SD 47.8) and 247.54 (SD 35.8) min, respectively (p=0,486). No differences were observed in length of hospital stay or conversion rate: 6 (5-34) vs. 5.6 (5-22) days, and 4 (11.4%) vs. 3 (13.6%) cases, respectively (p=0.126). The readmission rate was 3/35 patients (11.4%) treated with LDP and 6/22 (27.3%) cases of RDP (p=0.126). There were no differences in morbidity (Dindo-Clavien >= III) between the 2 groups. Mortality was one case in the robotic group (a patient with early conversion due to vascular involvement). The rate of R0 resection was greater and statistically significant in the RDP group (77.1% vs. 90.9%) (P=,04). Conclusions: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is a safe and feasible procedure in selected patients. Surgical planning and stepwise implementation based on prior experience help surgeons successfully perform technically demanding procedures. RDP could be the approach of choice in distal pancreatectomy, and it is not inferior to LDP. (c) 2023 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：765 / 771

页数：7

共 39 条

[1] Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J].

Anderson, Kevin L., Jr. ;

Adam, Mohamed A. ;

Thomas, Samantha ;

Roman, Sanziana A. ;

Sosa, Julie A. .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 213 (04) :601-605

[2] The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection [J].

Asbun, Horacio J. ;

Moekotte, Alma L. ;

Vissers, Frederique L. ;

Kunzler, Filipe ;

Cipriani, Federica ;

Alseidi, Adnan ;

D'Angelica, Michael I. ;

Balduzzi, Alberto ;

Bassi, Claudio ;

Bjornsson, Bergthor ;

Boggi, Ugo ;

Callery, Mark P. ;

Del Chiaro, Marco ;

Coimbra, Felipe J. ;

Conrad, Claudius ;

Cook, Andrew ;

Coppola, Alessandro ;

Dervenis, Christos ;

Dokmak, Safi ;

Edil, Barish H. ;

Edwin, Bjorn ;

Giulianotti, Pier C. ;

Han, Ho-Seong ;

Hansen, Paul D. ;

van der Heijde, Nicky ;

van Hilst, Jony ;

Hester, Caitlin A. ;

Hogg, Melissa E. ;

Jarufe, Nicolas ;

Jeyarajah, D. Rohan ;

Keck, Tobias ;

Kim, Song Cheol ;

Khatkov, Igor E. ;

Kokudo, Norihiro ;

Kooby, David A. ;

Korrel, Maarten ;

de Leon, Francisco J. ;

Lluis, Nuria ;

Lof, Sanne ;

Machado, Marcel A. ;

Demartines, Nicolas ;

Martinie, John B. ;

Merchant, Nipun B. ;

Molenaar, I. Quintus ;

Moravek, Cassadie ;

Mou, Yi-Ping ;

Nakamura, Masafumi ;

Nealon, William H. ;

Palanivelu, Chinnusamy ;

Pessaux, Patrick .

ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) :1-14

[3]

Azagra JS, 2022, DIG MED RES, V5, P21, DOI DOI 10.21037/DMR-22-6

[4] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After [J].

Bassi, Claudio ;

Marchegiani, Giovanni ;

Dervenis, Christos ;

Sarr, Micheal ;

Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;

Adham, Mustapha ;

Allen, Peter ;

Andersson, Roland ;

Asbun, Horacio J. ;

Besselink, Marc G. ;

Conlon, Kevin ;

Del Chiaro, Marco ;

Falconi, Massimo ;

Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;

Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos ;

Fingerhut, Abe ;

Friess, Helmut ;

Gouma, Dirk J. ;

Hackert, Thilo ;

Izbicki, Jakob ;

Lillemoe, Keith D. ;

Neoptolemos, John P. ;

Olah, Attila ;

Schulick, Richard ;

Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ;

Takada, Tadahiro ;

Takaori, Kyoichi ;

Traverso, William ;

Vollmer, Charles ;

Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;

Yeo, Charles J. ;

Salvia, Roberto ;

Buehler, Marcus .

SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) :584-591

[5] Assessing the impact of conversion on outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy [J].

Beane, Joal D. ;

Pitt, Henry A. ;

Dolejs, Scott C. ;

Hogg, Melissa E. ;

Zeh, Herbert J. ;

Zureikat, Amer H. .

HPB, 2018, 20 (04) :356-363

[6] Minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic cancer-are we there yet? A narrative review [J].

Bhandare, Manish S. ;

Parray, Amir ;

Chaudhari, Vikram A. ;

V. Shrikhande, Shailesh .

CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11 (01)

[7] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy (LAPOP): study protocol for a single center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial [J].

Bjornsson, Bergthor ;

Sandstrom, Per ;

Larsson, Anna Lindhoff ;

Hjalmarsson, Claes ;

Gasslander, Thomas .

TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)

[8] Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review [J].

Chan, Kai Siang ;

Wang, Zhong Kai ;

Syn, Nicholas ;

Goh, Brian K. P. .

SURGERY, 2021, 170 (01) :194-206

[9] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD) A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [J].

de Rooij, Thijs ;

van Hilst, Jony ;

van Santvoort, Hjalmar ;

Boerma, Djamila ;

van den Boezem, Peter ;

Daams, Freek ;

van Dam, Ronald ;

Dejong, Cees ;

van Duyn, Eino ;

Dijkgraaf, Marcel ;

van Eijck, Casper ;

Festen, Sebastiaan ;

Gerhards, Michael ;

Koerkamp, Bas Groot ;

de Hingh, Ignace ;

Kazemier, Geert ;

Klaase, Joost ;

de Kleine, Ruben ;

van Laarhoven, Cornelis ;

Luyer, Misha ;

Patijn, Gijs ;

Steenvoorde, Pascal ;

Suker, Mustafa ;

Abu Hilal, Moh'd ;

Busch, Olivier ;

Besselink, Marc .

ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (01) :2-9

[10] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].

Dindo, D ;

Demartines, N ;

Clavien, PA .

ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213

← 1 2 3 4 →