Measurement of Stroke Volume With Echocardiography Compared to Gold Standard Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Observational Study

被引:4
|
作者
Cowie, Brian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wright, Leah [2 ]
Costello, Ben [2 ]
Janssens, Kristel [2 ]
Howden, Erin [2 ]
Flannery, Darragh [2 ]
Foulkes, Steve [2 ]
Kluger, Roman [1 ,3 ]
La Gerche, Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Baker Heart & Diabet Inst, Sports Cardiol, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Crit Care, Melbourne, Australia
[4] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Acute Pain Med, 45 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy 3065, Australia
关键词
stroke volume; cardiac output; echocardiography; transthoracic; magnetic resonance imaging; VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT; AORTIC-VALVE AREA; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; AGREEMENT; STENOSIS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.024
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: The authors aimed to compare the assessment of left ventricular (LV) stroke volume with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using 2-and 3-dimensional (2D and 3D) Doppler and volumetric techniques with gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).Design: An observational study.Setting: A medical research institute.Participants: A total of 187 volunteer participants free of known structural heart disease.Interventions: None.Measurements and Main Results: LV stroke volume was measured with TTE using the following 4 techniques: LV outflow tract (LVOT) pulsed wave Doppler with 2D LVOT area, LVOT pulsed wave Doppler with 3D LVOT area, 2D volumetric (Simpson's biplane), and 3D volumetric techniques. This was compared with gold standard CMR. Stroke volume measured with echocardiography underestimated stroke volume com-pared to CMR by all techniques (p < 0.001 for all values compared to CMR). The LVOT Doppler stroke volume with a 3D area most closely agreed with CMR, with a bias of 6.35%. This bias progressively increased with 3D volumetric (13.4%), LVOT Doppler with a 2D area (15.1%), and 2D volumetric (18.3%) stroke volume techniques, with wider limits of agreement.Conclusion: Of the 4 echocardiographic LV stroke volume measurement methods the authors assessed, stroke volume with LVOT Doppler using 3D measurement of LVOT area most closely approximates gold standard CMR.Crown Copyright & COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1645
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Left Ventricular Stroke Volume Quantification by Contrast Echocardiography - Comparison of Linear and Flow-Based Methods to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
    Dele-Michael, Abiola O.
    Fujikura, Kana
    Devereux, Richard B.
    Islam, Fahmida
    Hriljac, Ingrid
    Wilson, Sean R.
    Lin, Fay
    Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2013, 30 (08): : 880 - 888
  • [32] Comparison of non-triggered magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography for the assessment of left atrial volume and morphology
    van den Berg, Nicoline W. E.
    Yin, Dean R. P. P. Chan Pin
    Berger, Wouter R.
    Neefs, Jolien
    De Bruin-Bon, Rianne H. A. C. M.
    Marquering, Henk A.
    Slaar, Annelie
    Planken, R. Nils
    de Groot, Joris R.
    CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND, 2018, 16
  • [33] Multimodality Imaging of the Neglected Valve: Role of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Computed Tomography in Pulmonary Stenosis and Regurgitation
    Costantini, Pietro
    Perone, Francesco
    Siani, Agnese
    Groenhoff, Leon
    Muscogiuri, Giuseppe
    Sironi, Sandro
    Marra, Paolo
    Carriero, Serena
    Pavon, Anna Giulia
    Guglielmo, Marco
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2022, 8 (10)
  • [34] Measurement of left ventricular volume after anterior myocardial infarction: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and radionuclide ventriculography
    Darasz, KH
    Underwood, SR
    Bayliss, J
    Forbat, SM
    Keegan, J
    Poole-Wilson, PA
    Sutton, GC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2002, 18 (02): : 135 - 142
  • [35] Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with standard imaging planes for mitral valve scallop pathology: interrater agreement and comparison with echocardiography
    Stinne Byrholdt Søgaard
    Pia Gustavsen
    Morten Dalsgaard
    Niels G. Vejlstrup
    Per Lav Madsen
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021, 37 : 605 - 611
  • [36] Left Ventricular Mass, Myocardial Structure, and Function in Severe Aortic Stenosis: an Echocardiographic and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
    Craft, Jason
    Weber, Jonathan
    Cao, Jane J.
    Mba, Michael
    Phd, Nora
    Bond, Kristine
    Khalique, Omar K.
    Barasch, Eddy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 205 : 311 - 320
  • [37] Update on cardiac imaging techniques. Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography
    Garcia de Vinuesaa, Pastora Gallego
    Velasco del Castillo, Sonia
    Aguilar Torres, Rio
    Pare Bardera, Juan C.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2008, 61 : 109 - 131
  • [38] Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis comparison with echocardiography
    Caruthers, SD
    Lin, SJ
    Brown, P
    Watkins, MP
    Williams, TA
    Lehr, KA
    Wickline, SA
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (18) : 2236 - 2243
  • [39] Patients With Undetermined Stroke Have Increased Atrial Fibrosis A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
    Fonseca, Ana Catarina
    Alves, Pedro
    Inacio, Nuno
    Marto, Joao Pedro
    Viana-Baptista, Miguel
    Pinho-e-Melo, Teresa
    Ferro, Jose M.
    Almeida, Ana G.
    STROKE, 2018, 49 (03) : 734 - 737
  • [40] Noninvasive stratification of postinfarction rats based on the degree of cardiac dysfunction using magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography
    Aronsen, Jan Magnus
    Espe, Emil Knut Stenersen
    Skardal, Kristine
    Hasic, Almira
    Zhang, Lili
    Sjaastad, Ivar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 312 (05): : H932 - H942