Can a pursuit of productivity be reconciled with sustainable practices in small-scale farming? Evidence from central and eastern Europe

被引:11
作者
Czyzewski, Bazyli [1 ]
Kryszak, Lukasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Poznan, Poland
关键词
Development of agriculture; Public goods; Eco-efficiency; Small farms; Sustainable agriculture; Agricultural policy; ASSESSING ECO-EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; PUBLIC-GOODS; DEA; PERFORMANCE; POLICY; CHINA; AGRICULTURE; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137684
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Small farms constitute the vast majority of agricultural holdings in the world. Therefore, there are the questions of how the small farm sector should evolve and whether economic and environmental goals can be pursued simultaneously. The main objective of this article is to identify potential improvements (a non-radial inefficiency slack) in small farms in Central and Eastern Europe with different types of farming under an environmentally adjusted production function. Based on this, potential development pathways for small farms are assumed. A hybrid data envelopment analysis meta-frontier super-efficiency model with environmental proxies reflecting biodiversity (i.e. crops diversity, grassland, orchards, vineyards) and undesirable outputs (such as soil organic matter loss and GHG sources) and an uncontrollable policy input is used on a country-representative sample of 2320 small farms in four countries: Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Moldova. We found that the more technically efficient small farms are also usually more sustainable when socially desirable criteria were considered. Crops small farms can evolve in two directions: "landscape guardians" and "artisanal (traditional) framers." Livestock farms could either maintain the status quo or choose an exit pathway. Mixed farms are likely to become land-scape guardians, while a sustainable intensification path is open for 20% of farms that specialize in permanent crops.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Modelling environmental technical efficiency and phosphorus pollution abatement cost in dairy farms [J].
Adenuga, Adewale Henry ;
Davis, John ;
Hutchinson, George ;
Patton, Myles ;
Donnellan, Trevor .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714
[2]   Environmental Efficiency and Pollution Costs of Nitrogen Surplus in Dairy Farms: A Parametric Hyperbolic Technology Distance Function Approach [J].
Adenuga, Adewale Henry ;
Davis, John ;
Hutchinson, George ;
Donnellan, Trevor ;
Patton, Myles .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 74 (03) :1273-1298
[3]  
Allen B., 2014, Biodiversity protection through results based remuneration of ecological achievement: report prepared for the European Commission, DG Environment, contract no ENV.B.2/ETU/2013/0046
[4]   A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSEN, P ;
PETERSEN, NC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1261-1265
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, JRC REFERENCE REPORT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The state of Food and Agriculture: Innovation in family farming
[7]   EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS FOR EXOGENOUSLY FIXED INPUTS AND OUTPUTS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
MOREY, RC .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (04) :513-521
[8]   Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy [J].
Bartolini, Fabio ;
Vergamini, Daniele ;
Longhitano, Davide ;
Povellato, Andrea .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 107
[9]   Assessing eco-efficiency: A metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis [J].
Beltran-Esteve, Mercedes ;
Reig-Martinez, Ernest ;
Estruch-Guitart, Vicent .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 :116-127
[10]   Assessing eco-efficiency of arable farms in rural areas [J].
Bonfiglio, Andrea ;
Arzeni, Andrea ;
Bodini, Antonella .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 151 :114-125