Developing criteria for advanced exergoeconomic performance analysis of thermal energy systems: Application to a marine steam power plant

被引:2
作者
Koroglu, Turgay [1 ]
Sogut, Oguz Salim [2 ]
机构
[1] Bandirma Onyedi Eylul Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Balikesir, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Advanced exergoeconomic analysis; Advanced exergoeconomic performance; criteria; Marine power plant; Energy systems; Exergy based evaluation; ADVANCED EXERGY ANALYSIS; HEAT-RECOVERY SYSTEM; FUEL-CELL; CYCLE; WASTE; SEPARATION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.126582
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Advanced exergoeconomic analysis is a powerful tool to evaluate the economic improvement potential of a system, but it lacks providing information on the required investments to be made to improve the system and its components while considering cost-benefit assessments. In this paper novel criteria are introduced as an extension to fulfill the shortcomings of mentioned analysis and provide further insight about investment feasi-bility of components as well as the whole system including but not limited to the amount of avoided exergy destruction per unit renovating cost, the renovating cost to improve the efficiency, the amount of profit after renovation. The criteria are applied to a marine steam power plant to evaluate the system and its components. The results show that boiler has the highest avoidable exergy destruction cost of 77.4 $/h while the third stage of low-pressure turbine (LPT3) has the highest recovered exergy destruction per dollar invested. On the other hand, by investing in boiler, the saving potential is 36.8 $/h and on LPT3 it is 6.5$/h. It has been observed that the overall system has avoidable exergy destruction cost of 101$/h, while a 52.7 $/h part of it could be saved with the improvement investments made.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Advanced life cycle integrated exergoeconomic analysis of building heating systems: An application and proposing new indices [J].
Acikkalp, Emin ;
Hepbasli, Arif ;
Yucer, Cem Tahsin ;
Karakoc, T. Hikmet .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 :851-860
[2]   Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analysis for a polygeneration plant operating in geothermal cascade [J].
Ambriz-Diaz, Victor M. ;
Rubio-Maya, Carlos ;
Ruiz-Casanova, Eduardo ;
Martinez-Patino, Jesus ;
Pastor-Martinez, Edgar .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 203
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE PARIS AGREEMENT
[4]   Investigation of a combined molten carbonate fuel cell, gas turbine and Stirling engine combined cooling heating and power (CCHP) process by exergy cost sensitivity analysis [J].
Ansarinasab, Hojat ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 165 :291-303
[5]   Advanced exergoeconomic evaluation of a new cryogenic helium recovery process from natural gas based on the flash separation - APCI modified process [J].
Ansarinasab, Hojat ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi ;
Pouriman, Mohammadhosein .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 132 :368-380
[6]  
Bejan A., 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-7007(97)87632-3
[7]   Energy, exergy and advanced exergy analysis of a milk processing factory [J].
Buhler, Fabian ;
Tuong-Van Nguyen ;
Jensen, Jonas Kjaer ;
Holm, Fridolin Mueller ;
Elmegaard, Brian .
ENERGY, 2018, 162 :576-592
[8]   Advanced exergy assessment of a solar absorption power cycle [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Rostamian, Fateme ;
Ebadollahi, Mohammad ;
Bezaatpour, Mojtaba ;
Ghaebi, Hadi .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 183 :561-574
[9]  
Cengel YA., 2014, HEAT MASS TRANSFER F
[10]  
Coleman MJ, 2013, SHIP WEIGHT REDUCTIO