Film measurement and analytical approach for assessing treatment accuracy and latency in a magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy system

被引:2
作者
Nakayama, Hiroki [1 ,2 ]
Okamoto, Hiroyuki [1 ,7 ]
Nakamura, Satoshi [1 ]
Iijima, Kotaro [1 ]
Chiba, Takahito [1 ,2 ]
Takemori, Mihiro [1 ]
Nakaichi, Tetsu [1 ]
Mikasa, Shohei [1 ]
Fujii, Kyohei [3 ]
Sakasai, Tatsuya [4 ]
Kuwahara, Junichi [1 ,4 ]
Miura, Yuki [5 ]
Fujiyama, Daisuke [4 ]
Tsunoda, Yuki [4 ]
Hanzawa, Takuma [4 ]
Igaki, Hiroshi [6 ]
Chang, Weishan [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Radiat Safety & Qual Assurance Div, Chuo ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Grad Sch Human Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, Arakawa Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Komazawa Univ, Dept Radiat Sci, Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol Technol, Chuo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Radiol Technol, Chiba, Japan
[6] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chuo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Natl Canc Ctr, Radiat Safety & Qual Assurance Div, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2023年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
gating method; latency; magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy; quality assurance; TUMOR-TRACKING RADIOTHERAPY; LUNG-TUMOR; CT SCANS; DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION; GATED RADIOTHERAPY; MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; PHANTOM; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13915
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeWe measure the dose distribution of gated delivery for different target motions and estimate the gating latency in a magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system. MethodThe dose distribution accuracy of the gated MRgRT system (MRIdian, Viewray) was investigated using an in-house-developed phantom that was compatible with the magnetic field and gating method. This phantom contains a simulated tumor and a radiochromic film (EBT3, Ashland, Inc.). To investigate the effect of the number of beam switching and target velocity on the dose distribution, two types of target motions were applied. One is that the target was periodically moved at a constant velocity of 5 mm/s with different pause times (0, 1, 3, 10, and 20 s) between the motions. During different pause times, different numbers of beams were switched on/off. The other one is that the target was moved at velocities of 3, 5, 8, and 10 mm/s without any pause (i.e., continuous motion). The gated method was applied to these motions at MRIdian, and the dose distributions in each condition were measured using films. To investigate the relation between target motion and dose distribution in the gating method, we compared the results of the gamma analysis of the calculated and measured dose distributions. Moreover, we analytically estimated the gating latencies from the dose distributions measured using films and the gamma analysis results. ResultsThe gamma pass rate linearly decreased with increasing beam switching and target velocity. The overall gating latencies of beam-hold and beam-on were 0.51 +/- 0.17 and 0.35 +/- 0.05 s, respectively. ConclusionsFilm measurements highlighted the factors affecting the treatment accuracy of the gated MRgRT system. Our analytical approach, employing gamma analysis on films, can be used to estimate the overall latency of the gated MRgRT system.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Target volume definition for upper abdominal irradiation using CT scans obtained during inhale and exhale phases
    Aruga, T
    Itami, J
    Aruga, M
    Nakajima, K
    Shibata, K
    Nojo, T
    Yasuda, S
    Uno, T
    Hara, R
    Isobe, K
    Machida, N
    Ito, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02): : 465 - 469
  • [2] Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing
    Balter, JM
    TenHaken, RK
    Lawrence, TS
    Lam, KL
    Robertson, JM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (01): : 167 - 174
  • [3] Fundamentals of balanced steady state free precession MRI
    Bieri, Oliver
    Scheffler, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (01) : 2 - 11
  • [4] ReconSocket: a low-latency raw data streaming interface for real-time MRI-guided radiotherapy
    Borman, P. T. S.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    Glitzner, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (18)
  • [5] Characterization of imaging latency for real-time MRI-guided radiotherapy
    Borman, P. T. S.
    Tijssen, R. H. N.
    Bos, C.
    Moonen, C. T. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    Glitzner, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (15)
  • [6] MLC tracking for lung SABR reduces planning target volumes and dose to organs at risk
    Caillet, Vincent
    Keall, Paul J.
    Colvill, Emma
    Hardcastle, Nicholas
    O'Brien, Ricky
    Szymura, Kathryn
    Booth, Jeremy T.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [7] Anthropomorphic phantom for deformable lung and liver CT and MR imaging for radiotherapy
    Colvill, Emma
    Krieger, Miriam
    Bosshard, Patrick
    Steinacher, Patrice
    Schnidrig, Benno Andreas Rohrer
    Parkel, Thomas
    Stergiou, Ioannis
    Zhang, Ye
    Peroni, Marta
    Safai, Sairos
    Weber, Damien Charles
    Lomax, Antony
    Fattori, Giovanni
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (07)
  • [8] Reproducibility of liver position using active breathing coordinator for liver cancer radiotherapy
    Eccles, C
    Brock, KK
    Bissonnette, JP
    Hawkins, M
    Dawson, LA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (03): : 751 - 759
  • [9] Tumor Trailing for Liver SBRT on the MR-Linac
    Fast, Martin
    van de Schoot, Agustinus
    van de Lindt, Tessa
    Carbaat, Casper
    van der Heide, Uulke
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 103 (02): : 468 - 478
  • [10] Interplay effects in highly modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy lung cases treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Fernandez, Desmond J.
    Sick, Justin T.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 58 - 69