How do different Industry 4.0 technologies support certain Circular Economy practices?

被引:39
作者
Lei, Zhimei [1 ]
Cai, Shanshan [1 ]
Cui, Li [2 ]
Wu, Lin [3 ]
Liu, Yiwei [4 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Management & Econ, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Business, Panjin, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Univ Business Sch, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Sch Business, Exeter, Devon, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; technologies; Technology adoption; Circular economy practices; Social network analysis; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; FRAMEWORK; INTERNET; CONTEXT; MODELS; CHAIN;
D O I
10.1108/IMDS-05-2022-0270
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose Uncovering the relationship between Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies and circular economy (CE) practices is critical not only for implementing CE but also for leveraging I4.0 to achieve sustainable development goals. However, the potential connection between them - especially how different I4.0 technologies may influence various CE practices - remains inadequately researched. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively explore the impacts of various I4.0 technologies on CE practices. Design/methodology/approach A mixed method consisting of a systematic literature review, content analysis, and social network analysis was adopted. First, 266 articles were selected and mined for contents of I4.0 technologies and CE practices; 27 I4.0 technologies and 21 CE practices were identified. Second, 62 articles were found that prove the positive influence of I4.0 technologies on CE practices, and 124 relationships were identified. Third, based on evidence supporting the link between I4.0 technologies and CE practices, a two-mode network and two one-mode networks were constructed, and their network density and degree centrality indicators were analyzed. Findings I4.0 technologies have a low application scope and degree for promoting CE. The adoption of a single I4.0 technology has limited effect on CE practices, and wider benefits can be realized through integrating I4.0 technologies. The Internet of Things (IoT), additive manufacturing, big data and analytics, and artificial intelligence (AI) are among the top technologies promoting CE implementation and reduction and recycling were identified as the main mechanism. The integration of these technologies is the most popular and effective. Twelve CE practices were identified to be the most widely implemented and supported by I4.0 technologies. Research limitations/implications First, only journal articles, reviews, and online publications written in English were selected, excluding articles published in other languages. Therefore, the results obtained only represent a specific group of scholars, which may be fragmented to a certain extent. Second, because the extraction of the impact of I4.0 on CE mainly relies on a manual literature review, this paper only provides the statistics of the number of publications involving relationships, while lacking the weight measurement of relationships. Originality/value A comprehensive, quantitative, and visual analysis method was employed to unveil the current implementation levels of I4.0 technologies and CE practices. Further, it was explored how different I4.0 technologies can affect various CE aspects, how different I4.0 technologies are integrated to promote CE realization, and how various CE practices are implemented simultaneously by I4.0 technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1251
页数:32
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Cyber-Physical Systems as an Enabler of Circular Economy to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: A Comprehensive Review [J].
Ahmed, Aser Alaa ;
Nazzal, Mohammad A. ;
Darras, Basil M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING-GREEN TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 9 (03) :955-975
[2]   Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development [J].
Bag, Surajit ;
Gupta, Shivam ;
Kumar, Sameer .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 231
[3]   Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: Resource melioration in logistics [J].
Bag, Surajit ;
Yadav, Gunjan ;
Wood, Lincoln C. ;
Dhamija, Pavitra ;
Joshi, Sudhanshu .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 68
[4]   Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy [J].
Bag, Surajit ;
Wood, Lincoln C. ;
Mangla, Sachin K. ;
Luthra, Sunil .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 152
[5]   Exploring the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on social sustainability through a circular economy approach [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Orzes, Guido ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 101 :176-190
[6]   A self-assessment tool for evaluating the integration of circular economy and industry 4.0 principles in closed-loop supply chains [J].
Belhadi, Amine ;
Kamble, Sachin S. ;
Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta ;
Mani, Venkatesh ;
Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman ;
Touriki, Fatima Ezahra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2022, 245
[7]  
Blömeke S, 2020, Procedia CIRP, V90, P600, DOI [10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.045, DOI 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2020.02.045, 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.045]
[8]   The role of digital technologies to overcome Circular Economy challenges in PSS Business Models: an exploratory case study [J].
Bressanelli, Gianmarco ;
Adrodegari, Federico ;
Perona, Marco ;
Saccani, Nicola .
10TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEMS, IPS2 2018, 2018, 73 :216-221
[9]   Exploring How Usage-Focused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies [J].
Bressanelli, Gianmarco ;
Adrodegari, Federico ;
Perona, Marco ;
Saccani, Nicola .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
[10]   Sustainability-based optimization criteria for industrial symbiosis: the Symbioptima case [J].
Brondi, C. ;
Cornago, S. ;
Ballarino, A. ;
Avai, A. ;
Pietraroia, D. ;
Dellepiane, U. ;
Niero, M. .
25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 :855-860