Interventions and contextual factors to improve retention in care for patients with hypertension in primary care: Hermeneutic systematic review

被引:2
作者
Ye, Jiancheng [1 ,2 ]
Sanuade, Olutobi A. [2 ,3 ]
Hirschhorn, Lisa R. [2 ,4 ]
Walunas, Theresa L. [2 ]
Smith, Justin D. [3 ]
Birkett, Michelle A. [2 ]
Baldridge, Abigail S. [2 ,4 ]
Ojji, Dike B. [5 ,6 ]
Huffman, Mark D. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Robert J Havey MD Inst Global Hlth, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Abuja, Teaching Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Unit, Gwagwalada, Nigeria
[6] Univ Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria
[7] Washington Univ St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[8] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Hypertension; Retention; Primary care; Implementation science; Hermeneutic systematic review; COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION; PHARMACIST INTERVENTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; HIV; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107880
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Regular engagement over time in hypertension care, or retention, is a crucial but understudied step in optimizing patient outcomes. This systematic review leverages a hermeneutic methodology to identify, evaluate, and quantify the effects of interventions and contextual factors for improving retention for patients with hypertension. Methods: We searched for articles that were published between 2000 and 2022 from multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO International Trials Registry. We followed the latest version of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline to report the findings for this review. We also synthesized the findings using a hermeneutic methodology for systematic reviews, which used an iterative process to review, integrate, analyze, and interpret evidence. Results: From 4686 screened titles and abstracts, 18 unique studies from 9 countries were identified, including 10 (56%) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 (17%) cluster RCTs, and 5 (28%) non-RCT studies. The number of participants ranged from 76 to 1562. The overall mean age range was 41-67 years, and the proportion of female participants ranged from 0% to 100%. Most (n = 17, 94%) studies used non-physician personnel to implement the proposed interventions. Fourteen studies (78%) implemented multilevel combinations of interventions. Education and training, team-based care, consultation, and Short Message Service reminders were the most common interventions tested. Conclusions: This review presents the most comprehensive findings on retention in hypertension care to date and fills the gaps in the literature, including the effectiveness of interventions, their components, and contextual factors. Adaptation of and implementing HIV care models, such differentiated service delivery, may be more effective and merit further study. Registration: CRD42021291368. Protocol registration: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021291368. Available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=291368
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effectiveness of interventions to improve laboratory requesting patterns among primary care physicians: a systematic review
    Sharon L. Cadogan
    John P. Browne
    Colin P. Bradley
    Mary R. Cahill
    Implementation Science, 10
  • [42] Suicide Interventions in Primary Care: A Selective Review of the Evidence
    Dueweke, Aubrey R.
    Bridges, Ana J.
    FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2018, 36 (03) : 289 - 302
  • [43] Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of cardiovascular risk factors among patients with hypertension in South African primary care
    Ngango, J. M.
    Omole, O. B.
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2018, 29 (06) : 344 - 351
  • [44] Effects of employing primary care doctors in hospital to improve the quality of care and health outcomes of rural patients: A systematic scoping review
    Sutarsa, I. Nyoman
    Kasim, Rosny
    Slimings, Claudia
    Bain-Donohue, Suzanne
    Barnard, Amanda
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 29 (04) : 492 - 501
  • [45] Pharmaceutical care in hypertensive patients: A systematic literature review
    Aguiar, Patricia M.
    Balisa-Rocha, Blicie J.
    Brito, Giselle de C.
    da Silva, Wellington B.
    Machado, Marcio
    Lyra, Divaldo P., Jr.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2012, 8 (05) : 383 - 396
  • [46] The effects of multidisciplinary collaborative care on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tu, Qiang
    Lin, Shuanglan
    Hyun, Karice
    Hafiz, Nashid
    Manandi, Deborah
    Koh, Angela S.
    Redfern, Julie
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2024, 18 (04) : 381 - 392
  • [47] A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care
    Milena Paneque
    Daniela Turchetti
    Leigh Jackson
    Peter Lunt
    Elisa Houwink
    Heather Skirton
    BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [48] Brief interventions for suicidal ideation in primary care: a systematic review
    Puya Younesi
    Carolin Haas
    Tobias Dreischulte
    Andrea Schmitt
    Jochen Gensichen
    Karoline Lukaschek
    BMC Primary Care, 26 (1):
  • [49] Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions
    Travers, John
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    Bailey, Jade
    Cooney, Marie-Therese
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (678) : E61 - E69
  • [50] Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review
    Liu, Hueiming
    Mohammed, Alim
    Shanthosh, Janani
    News, Madeline
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    Hackett, Maree L.
    Peiris, David
    Jan, Stephen
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):