Interventions and contextual factors to improve retention in care for patients with hypertension in primary care: Hermeneutic systematic review

被引:2
作者
Ye, Jiancheng [1 ,2 ]
Sanuade, Olutobi A. [2 ,3 ]
Hirschhorn, Lisa R. [2 ,4 ]
Walunas, Theresa L. [2 ]
Smith, Justin D. [3 ]
Birkett, Michelle A. [2 ]
Baldridge, Abigail S. [2 ,4 ]
Ojji, Dike B. [5 ,6 ]
Huffman, Mark D. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Robert J Havey MD Inst Global Hlth, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Abuja, Teaching Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Unit, Gwagwalada, Nigeria
[6] Univ Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria
[7] Washington Univ St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[8] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Hypertension; Retention; Primary care; Implementation science; Hermeneutic systematic review; COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION; PHARMACIST INTERVENTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; HIV; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107880
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Regular engagement over time in hypertension care, or retention, is a crucial but understudied step in optimizing patient outcomes. This systematic review leverages a hermeneutic methodology to identify, evaluate, and quantify the effects of interventions and contextual factors for improving retention for patients with hypertension. Methods: We searched for articles that were published between 2000 and 2022 from multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO International Trials Registry. We followed the latest version of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline to report the findings for this review. We also synthesized the findings using a hermeneutic methodology for systematic reviews, which used an iterative process to review, integrate, analyze, and interpret evidence. Results: From 4686 screened titles and abstracts, 18 unique studies from 9 countries were identified, including 10 (56%) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 (17%) cluster RCTs, and 5 (28%) non-RCT studies. The number of participants ranged from 76 to 1562. The overall mean age range was 41-67 years, and the proportion of female participants ranged from 0% to 100%. Most (n = 17, 94%) studies used non-physician personnel to implement the proposed interventions. Fourteen studies (78%) implemented multilevel combinations of interventions. Education and training, team-based care, consultation, and Short Message Service reminders were the most common interventions tested. Conclusions: This review presents the most comprehensive findings on retention in hypertension care to date and fills the gaps in the literature, including the effectiveness of interventions, their components, and contextual factors. Adaptation of and implementing HIV care models, such differentiated service delivery, may be more effective and merit further study. Registration: CRD42021291368. Protocol registration: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021291368. Available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=291368
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interventions to reduce wait times for primary care appointments: a systematic review
    Ansell, Dominique
    Crispo, James A. G.
    Simard, Benjamin
    Bjerre, Lise M.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [32] Systematic review of motivational interventions to improve adherence to medication in patients with hypertension and meta-analysis
    Rosendo-Silva, B.
    Ortigosa-Ferreira, A. C.
    Prazeres, F.
    Caramelo, F.
    Santiago, L. M.
    Rosendo, I.
    HIPERTENSION Y RIESGO VASCULAR, 2023, 40 (04): : 174 - 196
  • [33] Health Care Delivery Interventions for Hypertension Management in Underserved Populations in the United States: A Systematic Review
    Pasha, Maarya
    Brewer, LaPrincess C.
    Sennhauser, Susie
    Alsawas, Mouaz
    Murad, M. Hassan
    HYPERTENSION, 2021, 78 (04) : 955 - 965
  • [34] Effectiveness of interventions to improve the detection and treatment of osteoporosis in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laliberte, M. -C.
    Perreault, S.
    Jouini, G.
    Shea, B. J.
    Lalonde, L.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (11) : 2743 - 2768
  • [35] Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings
    Smith, Susan M.
    Soubhi, Hassan
    Fortin, Martin
    Hudon, Catherine
    O'Dowd, Tom
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [36] Interventions in primary care to improve cardiovascular risk factors and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with diabetes: a systematic review
    Seitz, P.
    Rosemann, T.
    Gensichen, J.
    Huber, C. A.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2011, 13 (06) : 479 - 489
  • [37] The Role of Health Technologies in Multicomponent Primary Care Interventions: Systematic Review
    Jimenez, Geronimo
    Matchar, David
    Koh, Choon Huat Gerald
    van der Kleij, Rianne
    Chavannes, Niels H.
    Car, Josip
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01)
  • [38] Collaborative Care Models to Improve Pain and Reduce Opioid Use in Primary Care: a Systematic Review
    Heavey, Sarah Cercone
    Bleasdale, Jacob
    Rosenfeld, Eve A.
    Beehler, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 38 (13) : 3021 - 3040
  • [39] Interventions to improve the use of EMRs in primary health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hamade, Noura
    Terry, Amanda
    Malvankar-Mehta, Monali
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2019, 26 (01)
  • [40] The effectiveness of interventions to improve laboratory requesting patterns among primary care physicians: a systematic review
    Sharon L. Cadogan
    John P. Browne
    Colin P. Bradley
    Mary R. Cahill
    Implementation Science, 10