Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level: Are there any correlations with outcomes?

被引:7
作者
El-Qawaqzeh, Khaled [1 ]
Magnotti, Louis J. [1 ]
Hosseinpour, Hamidreza [1 ]
Nelson, Adam [1 ]
Spencer, Audrey L. [1 ]
Anand, Tanya [1 ]
Bhogadi, Sai Krishna [1 ]
Alizai, Qaidar [1 ]
Ditillo, Michael [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Surg, 1501 N Campbell Ave,Room 5411,POB 245063, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2024年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词
Trauma; Geriatric trauma; Frailty; Trauma centers; MORTALITY; IMPACT; CARE; ACCESS; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2023.110972
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients' outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes. Study design: Patients >= 65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017-2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days. Results: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2-9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[51]   Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database [J].
Velanovich, Vic ;
Antoine, Heath ;
Swartz, Andrew ;
Peters, David ;
Rubinfeld, Ilan .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 183 (01) :104-110
[52]   Undertriage of Geriatric Trauma Patients in Florida [J].
Weber, Courtney ;
Millen, Janelle Cheri ;
Liu, Huazhi ;
Clark, Jason ;
Ferber, Lawrence ;
Richards, Winston ;
Ang, Darwin .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 279 :427-435