共 52 条
Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level: Are there any correlations with outcomes?
被引:7
作者:
El-Qawaqzeh, Khaled
[1
]
Magnotti, Louis J.
[1
]
Hosseinpour, Hamidreza
[1
]
Nelson, Adam
[1
]
Spencer, Audrey L.
[1
]
Anand, Tanya
[1
]
Bhogadi, Sai Krishna
[1
]
Alizai, Qaidar
[1
]
Ditillo, Michael
[1
]
Joseph, Bellal
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Surg, 1501 N Campbell Ave,Room 5411,POB 245063, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
来源:
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
|
2024年
/
55卷
/
01期
关键词:
Trauma;
Geriatric trauma;
Frailty;
Trauma centers;
MORTALITY;
IMPACT;
CARE;
ACCESS;
AGE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.injury.2023.110972
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Introduction: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients' outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes. Study design: Patients >= 65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017-2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days. Results: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2-9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文