Regional assessment of household energy decision-making and technology adoption in the United States

被引:12
作者
Antonopoulos, Chrissi A. [1 ]
Fuentes, Tracy L. [1 ,2 ]
McCord, Kieren H. [1 ]
Rackley, Adrienne L. S. [1 ]
Biswas, Saurabh [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Energy & Environm Directorate, Richland, WA USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, 1100 Dexter Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
Residential energy decisions; Domestic space-making; Home upgrades and retrofits; Decarbonization; Mixed methods; energy behavior; EFFICIENCY INVESTMENTS; COGNITIVE INTERVIEWS; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; URBAN; DETERMINANTS; CONSUMPTION; HOMEOWNERS; BEHAVIORS; GAP; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113940
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To meet climate goals, significant reductions in residential building greenhouse gas emissions are necessary. Individual and household decisions regarding appliances and building technologies influence residential energy use. To investigate household energy behavior and technology choice, we created and analyzed a robust household survey (10,000 US residents) focused on resident preferences, motivations for changes, barriers, and household energy decisions. Regional differences emerged in preferences, motivations, and energy decisions, with the West dominating in overall adoption of decarbonization technologies. Reducing harmful health and environmental impacts were key motivators in the West. Primary fuel infrastructure was a driver for HVAC, water heating, and kitchen technology choices, although opportunities emerged for increased decarbonizationfriendly technology uptake in southern regions with existing electric infrastructure. Kitchen preferences and upgrades revealed opportunities for decarbonization programs to focus on kitchens. Program participation rates are low (9%) and were lowest in the Southeast and Central Southwest (similar to 7%). To narrow the large gap between willingness and actual adoption of decarbonization technologies (40%), we recommend integrating regional themes into messaging to increase program participation rates and key technology uptake nationally.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Female matters: Impact of a workfare program on intra-household female decision-making in rural India [J].
Tagat, Anirudh .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 20
[32]   Age matters: Ageing and household energy demand in the United States [J].
Estiri, Hossein ;
Zagheni, Emilio .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 55 :62-70
[33]   TMT Potency and Strategic Decision-Making in High Technology Firms [J].
Clark, Kevin D. ;
Maggitti, Patrick G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2012, 49 (07) :1168-1193
[34]   User decision-making and technology choices in the US carsharing market [J].
Zoepf, Stephen M. ;
Keith, David R. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 51 :150-157
[35]   Farmers' perception of their decision-making in relation to policy schemes: A comparison of case studies from Switzerland and the United States [J].
Celio, Enrico ;
Flint, Courtney G. ;
Schoch, Patrick ;
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 41 :163-171
[36]   A green home decision-making tool: Sustainability assessment for homeowners [J].
Li, Peixian ;
Froese, Thomas M. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 150 :421-431
[37]   Caregiver Decision-Making: Household Response to Child Illness in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Pierce, Hayley ;
Gibby, Ashley Larsen ;
Forste, Renata .
POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2016, 35 (05) :581-597
[38]   Inside Teacher Assessment Decision-Making: From Judgement Gestalts to Assessment Pathways [J].
Phung, De Van ;
Michell, Michael .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 07
[39]   Energy management in the industrial sector and sustainable decision-making model [J].
Borges, Fabricio Quadros .
NAVUS-REVISTA DE GESTAO E TECNOLOGIA, 2021, 11
[40]   Understanding the adoption of data-driven decision-making practices among Canadian DMOs [J].
Novotny, Michelle ;
Dodds, Rachel ;
Walsh, Philip R. .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & TOURISM, 2024, 26 (02) :331-345