Regional assessment of household energy decision-making and technology adoption in the United States

被引:12
作者
Antonopoulos, Chrissi A. [1 ]
Fuentes, Tracy L. [1 ,2 ]
McCord, Kieren H. [1 ]
Rackley, Adrienne L. S. [1 ]
Biswas, Saurabh [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Energy & Environm Directorate, Richland, WA USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, 1100 Dexter Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
Residential energy decisions; Domestic space-making; Home upgrades and retrofits; Decarbonization; Mixed methods; energy behavior; EFFICIENCY INVESTMENTS; COGNITIVE INTERVIEWS; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; URBAN; DETERMINANTS; CONSUMPTION; HOMEOWNERS; BEHAVIORS; GAP; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113940
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To meet climate goals, significant reductions in residential building greenhouse gas emissions are necessary. Individual and household decisions regarding appliances and building technologies influence residential energy use. To investigate household energy behavior and technology choice, we created and analyzed a robust household survey (10,000 US residents) focused on resident preferences, motivations for changes, barriers, and household energy decisions. Regional differences emerged in preferences, motivations, and energy decisions, with the West dominating in overall adoption of decarbonization technologies. Reducing harmful health and environmental impacts were key motivators in the West. Primary fuel infrastructure was a driver for HVAC, water heating, and kitchen technology choices, although opportunities emerged for increased decarbonizationfriendly technology uptake in southern regions with existing electric infrastructure. Kitchen preferences and upgrades revealed opportunities for decarbonization programs to focus on kitchens. Program participation rates are low (9%) and were lowest in the Southeast and Central Southwest (similar to 7%). To narrow the large gap between willingness and actual adoption of decarbonization technologies (40%), we recommend integrating regional themes into messaging to increase program participation rates and key technology uptake nationally.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Decision-making within the household: The role of division of labor and differences in preferences [J].
Alem, Yonas ;
Hassen, Sied ;
Kohlin, Gunnar .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2023, 207 :511-528
[22]   The carbon footprint of household energy use in the United States [J].
Goldstein, Benjamin ;
Gounaridis, Dimitrios ;
Newell, Joshua P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (32) :19122-19130
[23]   Intervention Characteristics Considered in Health Educators' Adoption Decision-Making Process [J].
Strayer, Thomas E., III ;
Balis, Laura E. ;
Kennedy, Lauren E. ;
Ramalingam, NithyaPriya S. ;
Wilson, Meghan L. ;
Harden, Samantha M. .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2023, 50 (03) :416-429
[24]   Gender Differences in Intra-Household Financial Decision-Making: An Application of Coarsened Exact Matching [J].
Booysen, Frederik ;
Guvuriro, Sevias .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (10)
[25]   Gender role differentiation in household fuel transition decision-making: Implications for education and training in Uganda [J].
Elasu, Joseph ;
Ntayi, Joseph Mpeera ;
Adaramola, Muyiwa S. ;
Buyinza, Faisal ;
Ngoma, Muhammad ;
Atukunda, Ronnette .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 4
[26]   Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study [J].
Wortley, Sally ;
Tong, Allison ;
Lancsar, Emily ;
Salkeld, Glenn ;
Howard, Kirsten .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
[27]   Effective Cloud Resource Utilisation in Cloud ERP Decision-Making Process for Industry 4.0 in the United States [J].
Marinho, Marlene ;
Prakash, Vijay ;
Garg, Lalit ;
Savaglio, Claudio ;
Bawa, Seema .
ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (08)
[28]   Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study [J].
Sally Wortley ;
Allison Tong ;
Emily Lancsar ;
Glenn Salkeld ;
Kirsten Howard .
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15
[29]   Modelling Decision-Making Processes of Regional Mobility in a Dyadic Framework [J].
Kern, Christoph ;
Stein, Petra .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 34 (04) :433-451
[30]   A hierarchical model of technology adoption for small owner-managed travel firms: An organizational decision-making and leadership perspective [J].
Spencer, Andrew J. ;
Buhalis, Dimitrios ;
Moital, Miguel .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 33 (05) :1195-1208