Regional assessment of household energy decision-making and technology adoption in the United States

被引:7
|
作者
Antonopoulos, Chrissi A. [1 ]
Fuentes, Tracy L. [1 ,2 ]
McCord, Kieren H. [1 ]
Rackley, Adrienne L. S. [1 ]
Biswas, Saurabh [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Energy & Environm Directorate, Richland, WA USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, 1100 Dexter Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
Residential energy decisions; Domestic space-making; Home upgrades and retrofits; Decarbonization; Mixed methods; energy behavior; EFFICIENCY INVESTMENTS; COGNITIVE INTERVIEWS; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; URBAN; DETERMINANTS; CONSUMPTION; HOMEOWNERS; BEHAVIORS; GAP; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113940
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To meet climate goals, significant reductions in residential building greenhouse gas emissions are necessary. Individual and household decisions regarding appliances and building technologies influence residential energy use. To investigate household energy behavior and technology choice, we created and analyzed a robust household survey (10,000 US residents) focused on resident preferences, motivations for changes, barriers, and household energy decisions. Regional differences emerged in preferences, motivations, and energy decisions, with the West dominating in overall adoption of decarbonization technologies. Reducing harmful health and environmental impacts were key motivators in the West. Primary fuel infrastructure was a driver for HVAC, water heating, and kitchen technology choices, although opportunities emerged for increased decarbonizationfriendly technology uptake in southern regions with existing electric infrastructure. Kitchen preferences and upgrades revealed opportunities for decarbonization programs to focus on kitchens. Program participation rates are low (9%) and were lowest in the Southeast and Central Southwest (similar to 7%). To narrow the large gap between willingness and actual adoption of decarbonization technologies (40%), we recommend integrating regional themes into messaging to increase program participation rates and key technology uptake nationally.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microgrid decision-making by public power utilities in the United States: A critical assessment of adoption and technological profiles
    Lenhart, Stephanie
    Araujo, Kathleen
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139
  • [2] A Decision-Making Model for Predicting Technology Adoption Success
    Tahriri, Farzad
    Mousavi, Maryam
    Galavi, Hadi
    Sorooshian, Shahryar
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [3] Testing An Adoption Decision-Making Model of Nursery and Greenhouse Growers' Water Reuse in the United States
    Lamm, Alexa J.
    Warner, Laura A.
    Tidwell, Abraham
    Lamm, Kevan W.
    Fisher, Paul R.
    White, Sarah
    WATER, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [4] China's Energy Decision-Making: becoming more like the United States?
    Kong, Bo
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2009, 18 (62) : 789 - 812
  • [5] Development and Application of Safety Technology Adoption Decision-Making Tool
    Nnaji, Chukwuma
    Gambatese, John
    Karakhan, Ali
    Osei-Kyei, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (04)
  • [6] The influence of emotional intelligence on technology adoption and decision-making process
    Abu-Shanab E.A.
    Abu Shanab A.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2022, 15 (05) : 604 - 622
  • [7] SUSTAINABILITY DECISION-MAKING BY USING TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Tulbure, Ildiko
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL III, 2016, : 577 - 584
  • [8] TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT AND POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING
    BOZEMAN, B
    ROSSINI, FA
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1979, 15 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [9] Decision-making with and without information technology in acute care hospitals: Survey in the united states
    Hatcher M.
    Journal of Medical Systems, 1998, 22 (6) : 397 - 404
  • [10] DECISION-MAKING WITHIN HOUSEHOLD
    DAVIS, HL
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1976, 2 (04) : 241 - 260