Land Certification, Adjustment Experience, and Green Production Technology Acceptance of Farmers: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China

被引:7
作者
Qu, Xinyue [1 ]
Zhou, Wenfeng [1 ]
He, Jia [1 ]
Xu, Dingde [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Sichuan Ctr Rural Dev Res, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
关键词
land certification; land adjustment; green production technology; acceptance behavior; China; TENURE SECURITY; INVESTMENT INCENTIVES; HOUSEHOLDS WILLINGNESS; MARKET PARTICIPATION; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; ENERGY-UTILIZATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RENTAL MARKET; CROP STRAW;
D O I
10.3390/land12040848
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land certification and adjustment experience, which are of great significance to strengthen farmers' acceptance of the green production technologies (the GPTs), are important factors that affect the stability of land property. Based on the research data of 540 farmers in Sichuan, China, the probit model is used in this research to explore the effect of the land certification upon the GPTs acceptance of farmers and discuss the moderation effect of land adjustment experience (large-scale adjustment and small-scale adjustment). The results show the following. (1) Overall, 10% of the farmers have not obtained the certificates, 17% of the farmers have experienced small-scale land adjustment, and 3% of the farmers have experienced large-scale land adjustment. Meanwhile, 15% of the farmers have not adopted any the green production technologies (the GPTs), and the rest have adopted at least one green production technology. (2) Land certification affects farmers' acceptance of the GPTs in a significant way. (3) Small-scale land adjustment will weaken the role of land certification in promoting farmers' acceptance of the green production technologies (the GPTs), while large-scale land adjustment will not. (4) For farmers with large scale of land, low extent of land fragmentation, and high extent of dependence on agricultural income, land certification will positively promote farmers' decision making on whether to accept the GPTs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures: Theoretical and empirical analyses [J].
Abdulai, Awudu ;
Owusu, Victor ;
Goetz, Renan .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 96 (01) :66-78
[2]   Transition pathways for Malaysian paddy farmers to sustainable agricultural practices: An integrated exhibiting tactics to adopt Green fertilizer [J].
Adnan, Nadia ;
Nordin, Shahrina Md ;
Anwar, Abdullah .
LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 90
[3]   A solution for the sunset industry: Adoption of Green Fertiliser Technology amongst Malaysian paddy farmers [J].
Adnan, Nadia ;
Nordin, Shahrina Md ;
Ali, Murad .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 79 :575-584
[4]   "Green technology": Bio-stimulation by an electric field for textile reactive dye contaminated agricultural soil [J].
Annamalai, Sivasankar ;
Santhanam, Manikandan ;
Selvaraj, Subbulakshmi ;
Sundaram, Maruthamuthu ;
Pandian, Kannan ;
Pazos, Marta .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 624 :1649-1657
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ISSUES AGR EC
[6]   Is land certification pro-poor? Evidence from Ethiopia [J].
Ayalew, Hailemariam ;
Admasu, Yeshwas ;
Chamberlin, Jordan .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 107
[7]   Land tenure security and investment incentives: puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso [J].
Brasselle, AS ;
Gaspart, F ;
Platteau, JP .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2002, 67 (02) :373-418
[8]  
Brenner C., 1998, INTELLECTUAL PROPERT
[9]  
Chang YX, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V269, DOI [10.1016/j.icarus.2020.110775, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110775]
[10]   THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1959, 2 (01) :1-40