The diagnostic value of blood sample NGS in patients with early periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Bingshi [1 ]
Li, Mengnan [1 ]
Liu, Yawei [1 ]
Zhang, Binquan [1 ]
Liu, Zeming [1 ]
Chen, Xiao [1 ]
Huo, Jia [1 ]
Han, Yongtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Osteonecrosis & Hip Surg, Hosp 3, 139 Zigiang Rd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
blood sample; diagnostic test; next-generation sequencing; periprosthetic joint infection; SENSITIVITY; CULTURES; FLUID;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.13943
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood samples from patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated by comparing it with drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The study was designed as a retrospective diagnostic test. Thirty-six infected patients were diagnosed with PJI according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and 57 volunteers were included in our study. NGS and bacterial culture were chosen to detect PJI after THA. Blood samples and drainage fluid were collected for NGS, and the drainage fluid, which was collected at the same time as the NGS drainage fluid sample, was used for bacterial culture. The primary outcomes of interest were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the infection group, 31 patients showed positive results by blood sample NGS, 33 patients showed positive results by drainage fluid NGS, and 17 patients showed positive bacterial culture results. In the control group, the results of 2 blood sample NGS, 16 drainage fluid NGS, and 3 bacterial cultures were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the blood sample were 0.86, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the drainage fluid samples were 0.92, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of bacterial culture were 0.47, 0.95, and 0.79, respectively. The study demonstrated that both the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were higher than those of bacterial culture, regardless of the kind of sample. Compared with drainage fluid NGS, the sensitivity of blood sample NGS was slightly lower (0.86 vs 0.92), but blood sample NGS showed higher specificity (0.96 vs 0.72). In total, the diagnostic value of blood sample NGS was superior to that of drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The majority of infected patients could be identified by blood sample NGS. Moreover, because of its high specificity, blood sample NGS can not only detect infectious bacteria but also distinguish infectious from non-infectious bacteria, which is dramatically different from using drainage fluid NGS.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 970
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mycobacterial periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty
    Hwang, Bo-Hyun
    Lee, Su-Chan
    Ong, Alvin
    Ahn, Hye-Sun
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 45 (12) : 3055 - 3062
  • [22] High incidence of early periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty with concomitant or previous hardware removal
    Ruben Scholten
    Wout Füssenich
    Matthijs P. Somford
    Job L. C. van Susante
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2019, 139 : 1051 - 1056
  • [23] High incidence of early periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty with concomitant or previous hardware removal
    Scholten, Ruben
    Fussenich, Wout
    Somford, Matthijs P.
    van Susante, Job L. C.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (08) : 1051 - 1056
  • [24] Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Who Have Ostomies Have an Increased Risk of Revisions for Periprosthetic Joint Infection, but Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Do Not
    Habibi, Akram A.
    Kingery, Matthew T.
    Anil, Utkarsh
    Lin, Charles C.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Davidovitch, Roy I.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (02):
  • [25] Arthroplasty-center related retrospective analysis of risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after primary and after revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Radtke, Kerstin
    Tetzlaff, T.
    Vaske, B.
    Ettinger, M.
    Claassen, L.
    Floerkemeier, T.
    Windhagen, H.
    von Lewinski, G.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 (05) : 721 - 728
  • [26] Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Elbow Arthroplasty
    Goyal, Nitin
    Luchetti, Timothy J.
    Wysocki, Robert W.
    Cohen, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 45 (10): : 957 - 970
  • [27] Clostridium difficile Infection Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty Independently Increases the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Deckey, David G.
    Boddu, Sayi P.
    Verhey, Jens T.
    Doxey, Stephen A.
    Spangehl, Mark J.
    Clarke, Henry D.
    Bingham, Joshua S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09):
  • [28] Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan, Emerito
    Delgado-Martinez, Alberto D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (20)
  • [29] Mortality During Total Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Natsuhara, Kyle M.
    Shelton, Trevor J.
    Meehan, John P.
    Lum, Zachary C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07): : S337 - S342
  • [30] Diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing to detect periprosthetic joint infection
    Yin, Han
    Xu, Duliang
    Wang, Dawei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)