Patterns and predictors of adolescent engagement in a mindfulness-based social-emotional learning program

被引:0
作者
Roudebush, Mckenna [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Murray, Desiree W. [1 ]
Netschytailo, Hannah [1 ]
Jensen, Todd M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Social Work, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, CB7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] 323E Rosenau Hall,CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
student engagement; mindfulness; peer connections; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; HIGH-SCHOOL; INTERVENTIONS; PERCEPTIONS; ELEMENTARY; MIDDLE; IMPLEMENTATION; TEACHERS; CLIMATE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/jad.12294
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) show promise for promoting positive youth development, little is known about student engagement in MBIs. Initial research presents mixed findings in MBI engagement related to participant characteristics, and there is a lack of research examining the influence of context on engagement, despite the critical role context plays in academic engagement. This study examines the contribution of student demographic characteristics and classroom context to MBI engagement. Methods: Survey engagement data were collected at three time points from 106 ninth grade students (M-age = 14.17 years, 60.4% female, 44.2% Black, 24.8% Hispanic/Latino) who participated in the Be CALM program during the 2021-2022 school year. Latent growth curve modeling was used to examine trajectory of student engagement and assess student and classroom predictors of engagement. Results: There was no overall change in the trajectory of student engagement, although variability was observed across classes. Identifying as Hispanic/Latino was associated with lower engagement (beta = -.25, p = .008), although this did not appear to be related to program experience. Peer connections predicted engagement at the end of the program (beta = .39, p < .001). Post hoc analyses suggested that student engagement may be related to teacher program delivery quality. Conclusions: Student engagement in MBIs appears related to classroom context more than student characteristics, although further research with larger samples is needed to assess the link between engagement and program outcomes. Findings have implications for designing school-based MBIs and training school staff to deliver them in culturally responsive ways.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 745
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
    Appleton, James J.
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Furlong, Michael J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2008, 45 (05) : 369 - 386
  • [2] Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument
    Appleton, James J.
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Kim, Dongjin
    Reschly, Amy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) : 427 - 445
  • [4] Bannirchelvam B., 2017, Contemporary School Psychology, V21, P304, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40688-017-0141-2
  • [5] Bernhardt P.E., 2013, School Community Journal, V25, P203
  • [6] Bingham GE, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P65, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_4
  • [7] Inequality in Black and White High School Students' Perceptions of School Support: An Examination of Race in Context
    Bottiani, Jessika H.
    Bradshaw, Catherine P.
    Mendelson, Tamar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2016, 45 (06) : 1176 - 1191
  • [8] Bowen NK., 2012, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
  • [9] Bradley G L., 2021, Handbook of Positive Youth Development: Advancing Research, Policy, and Practice in Global Contexts, P219, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-70262-5_15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-70262-5_15]
  • [10] Gender Differences in the Strength of Association between Perceived Support from Teachers and Student Engagement
    Bru, Edvin
    Virtanen, Tuomo
    Kjetilstad, Vidar
    Niemiec, Christopher P.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (01) : 153 - 168