Mesh-free Solution of ADR Equations: A Comparison Between the Application of Hybrid and Standard Radial Basis Functions

被引:0
作者
Mohammadinezhad, Z. [1 ]
Binesh, S. M. [1 ]
Hekmatzadeh, A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Hybrid radial basis function; Mesh-free method; Advection-dispersion-reaction equations; Particle Swarm Optimization; DATA APPROXIMATION SCHEME; INTERPOLATION; MULTIQUADRICS; COMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40996-023-01176-w
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Three types of radial basis functions comprising two standard radial basis functions (RBF) and a hybrid Gaussian-cubic (HGC) kernel have been adopted in this paper to solve three-dimensional advection-dispersion-reaction (ADR) equations by an RBF-based mesh-free method. In this context, radial point interpolation method (RPIM) is implemented as a mesh-free discretization tool and the weak form of governing equation is attained by Galerkin weighted residual technique. Since the utilized RBFs contain shape parameter and weight coefficients (in the case of HGC kernel) as the influential parameters on the results accuracy, optimal values of these parameters are assessed via an optimization algorithm based on Particle Swarm Optimization technique. Accuracy/adequacy of the utilized RBFs as well as their stability have been elaborated by solving some examples at the end of the paper. Since the main aim of the present paper is the comparison between performance of different RBFs in ADR equation solution, simple examples with known analytical solutions have been utilized in a unitary cube domain. Accordingly, by solving time-dependent and time-independent problems, it has been concluded that all considered RBFs can be successfully used in RPIM to render results with acceptable accuracy. Besides, the hybrid RBF ended up with the highest stability in comparison with the other RBFs.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 606
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Local maximum-entropy approximation schemes:: a seamless bridge between finite elements and meshfree methods [J].
Arroyo, M ;
Ortiz, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2006, 65 (13) :2167-2202
[2]   ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHODS [J].
BELYTSCHKO, T ;
LU, YY ;
GU, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1994, 37 (02) :229-256
[4]   Numerical computation of three-dimensional incompressible viscous flows in the primitive variable form by local multiquadric differential quadrature method [J].
Ding, H ;
Shu, C ;
Yeo, KS ;
Xu, D .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2006, 195 (7-8) :516-533
[5]   Error estimates of local multiquadric-based differential quadrature (LMQDQ) method through numerical experiments [J].
Ding, H ;
Shu, C ;
Tang, DB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2005, 63 (11) :1513-1529
[6]   SCATTERED DATA INTERPOLATION - TESTS OF SOME METHODS [J].
FRANKE, R .
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 1982, 38 (157) :181-200
[7]   MULTIQUADRIC EQUATIONS OF TOPOGRAPHY AND OTHER IRREGULAR SURFACES [J].
HARDY, RL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 76 (08) :1905-+
[8]   Unsteady seepage analysis using local radial basis function-based differential quadrature method [J].
Hashemi, M. R. ;
Hatam, F. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (10) :4934-4950
[9]   Error estimate, optimal shape factor, and high precision computation of multiquadric collocation method [J].
Huang, C.-S. ;
Lee, C-F. ;
Cheng, A. H. -D. .
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2007, 31 (07) :614-623