A collaborative model calibration framework under uncertainty considering parameter distribution

被引:6
作者
Feng, Shaojun [1 ]
Hao, Peng [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Wang, Bo [1 ]
Wang, Bin [2 ]
Yue, Chen [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Struct Anal Ind Equipment, Dept Engn Mech, Key Lab Digital Twin Ind Equipment, Dalian 116023, Liaoning Provin, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Astronaut Syst Engn, Beijing 100076, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Model calibration; Uncertainty quantification; Nested stochastic kriging; Optimization-based calibration; Bayesian method; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; QUANTIFICATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2022.115841
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Model calibration is critical to update unknown parameters and model differences between simulation and experiment. While some of the current methods can quantify response uncertainty and estimate the likelihood function of unknown parameters, calibration remains challenging when the parameters are uncertainties of unknown distribution. Considering model uncertainty inversion, we propose a collaborative calibration framework that quantifies and calibrates the distribution of unknown parameters. We used the Nested Stochastic Kriging (NSK) model to estimate the global trend and uncertainty of response data. The unknown parameters are then updated using the optimization-based calibration (OBC) method, where an infill sampling criterion is proposed. Finally, the variance of the parameter is calibrated. The calibrated model can reflect the uncertainty of the response data and can be further used to estimate the distribution of a new design. The proposed approach is tested using two numerical instances, and the bolt simulation model under tension-bending condition is calibrated using 30 experimental data points. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve the best performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Adhikari T.M., 2020, REV DEEP LEARNING TE, V628
[2]   STOCHASTIC KRIGING FOR SIMULATION METAMODELING [J].
Ankenman, Bruce ;
Nelson, Barry L. ;
Staum, Jeremy .
2008 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2008, :362-370
[3]   Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability [J].
Arendt, Paul D. ;
Apley, Daniel W. ;
Chen, Wei .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (10)
[4]   On the value of test data for reducing uncertainty in material models: Computational framework and application to spherical indentation [J].
Asaadi, Erfan ;
Heyns, P. Stephan ;
Haftka, Raphael T. ;
Tootkaboni, Mazdak .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 346 :513-529
[5]   Statistical calibration of computer simulations [J].
Campbell, Katherine .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (10-11) :1358-1363
[6]  
Chen W.F., 1998, CONNECTIONS STEEL ST
[7]   An iterative Bayesian filtering framework for fast and automated calibration of DEM models [J].
Cheng, Hongyang ;
Shuku, Takayuki ;
Thoeni, Klaus ;
Tempone, Pamela ;
Luding, Stefan ;
Magnanimo, Vanessa .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 350 :268-294
[8]   Evidential Model Validation under Epistemic Uncertainty [J].
Deng, Wei ;
Lu, Xi ;
Deng, Yong .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
[9]   A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. ;
Relun, N. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 111 :232-240
[10]   AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) :145-154