Agreement of methods to assess antimicrobial susceptibility using Escherichia coli isolates as target models

被引:1
作者
Andretta, Milimani [1 ]
Tavares, Rafaela de Melo [1 ]
Fusieger, Andressa [2 ]
Yamatogi, Ricardo Seiti [1 ]
Nero, Luis Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Vet, InsPOA Lab Inspecao Prod Origem Anim, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Tecnol Alimentos, InovaLeite Lab Pesquisa Leites & Derivados, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
关键词
disk diffusion; agar dilution; broth dilution; minimum inhibitory concentration; AGAR DILUTION; STENOTROPHOMONAS-MALTOPHILIA; BROTH MICRODILUTION; CAMPYLOBACTER SPP; DIFFUSION; PREVALENCE; RESISTANCE; CHALLENGE; ETEST;
D O I
10.1093/lambio/ovae009
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) conducted in vitro offer a range of methods to assess the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of microorganisms. Escherichia coli, a widely distributed bacterium, is closely linked to the issue of AMR. In this way, the present study aimed to assess the agreement among different in vitro AST methods, including disk diffusion in agar, broth dilution, and agar dilution method. A total of 100 E. coli isolates were analyzed for their resistance levels against six antibiotics: amoxicillin, ceftiofur, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim, using the aforementioned AST methods. Standard breakpoint values were employed to classify isolates as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible, and comparisons among the AST methods were conducted by McNemar's test (P < .05). The obtained data demonstrated equivalence among the AST methods, highlighting the reliability of these standardized classical methodologies. This standardization aids in preventing the inappropriate use of antimicrobials and the dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli Recovered from Milk and Related Samples
    Adzitey, Frederick
    Yussif, Saniyatu
    Ayamga, Roland
    Zuberu, Sumaila
    Addy, Francis
    Adu-Bonsu, Gideon
    Huda, Nurul
    Kobun, Rovina
    [J]. MICROORGANISMS, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices
  • [3] Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from cattle farms in Washington State
    Bae, W
    Kaya, KN
    Hancock, DD
    Call, DR
    Park, YH
    Besser, TE
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (01) : 169 - 174
  • [4] COMPARISON OF THE E-TEST TO AGAR DILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, AND AGAR DIFFUSION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING TECHNIQUES BY USING A SPECIAL CHALLENGE SET OF BACTERIA
    BAKER, CN
    STOCKER, SA
    CULVER, DH
    THORNSBERRY, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (03) : 533 - 538
  • [5] Ballash GA., 2023, Microbiol Spectr, V11, pe0524222
  • [6] Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review
    Balouiri, Mounyr
    Sadiki, Moulay
    Koraichi Ibnsouda, Saad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 6 (02) : 71 - 79
  • [7] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: currently used methods and devices and the near future in clinical practice
    Benkova, M.
    Soukup, O.
    Marek, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 129 (04) : 806 - 822
  • [8] Diagnosing antimicrobial resistance
    Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
    Leeds, Jennifer
    Nordmann, Patrice
    O'Grady, Justin
    Patel, Jean
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (11) : 697 - 703
  • [9] CLSI, 2018, CLSI Guideline M07Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, V11th edn
  • [10] CLSI, 2020, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st, V30th