Does social media use enhance low-carbon behavioral intentions? Evidence from Chinese college students

被引:1
作者
Tong, Qingmeng [1 ]
Zheng, Yixuan [1 ]
Zhang, Junbiao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Rural Revitalizat Res Inst, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
social media; low-carbon; behavioral intention; college students; China; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; GENDER; BELIEFS; MODELS; DRIVES; NORMS;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2023.2297927
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Although there is a growing recognition of the Internet's role in promoting environmental sustainability, the impact of social media use on low-carbon behavioral intentions remains poorly understood. Based on the survey data for 1,056 contemporary college students from 9 universities in China, this paper examines how social media use affects their intentions regarding low-carbon behaviors. An IV-Ordered Probit model is employed to account for the endogeneity issue and generate accurate estimates. The results indicate that, overall, the frequency of social media use has a significantly positive impact on college students' intentions to adopt low-carbon behaviors, mainly by improving their subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Additionally, considerable heterogeneities are observed among students of different genders and grades. Knowledge, concern, and belief regarding climate change also have a significant effect on behavioral intentions. Finally, this paper proposes several policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of social media in promoting low-carbon behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:1741 / 1760
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Ajzen I, 2019, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, VOL 1: BASIC PRINCIPLES, 2ND EDITION, P197
[2]   TEACHERS' BELIEFS AND THE FORMATION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL POTENTIAL IN STUDENTS [J].
Cruz, Tamara de la Torre ;
Escolar-Llamazares, Maria-Camino ;
Valle, Cristina Di Giusto ;
Rico, Isabel Luis ;
Eguizabal, Alfredo Jimenez ;
Jimenez, Alfredo .
INTERCIENCIA, 2023, 48 (08) :398-408
[3]   What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft [J].
Alemi, Farzad ;
Circella, Giovanni ;
Mokhtarian, Patricia ;
Handy, Susan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 102 :233-248
[4]   Millennials' green consumption behaviour: Exploring the role of social media [J].
Bedard, Stephanie Anne Nicole ;
Tolmie, Carri Reisdorf .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (06) :1388-1396
[5]   How does individual low-carbon consumption behavior occur? - An analysis based on attitude process [J].
Chen, Hong ;
Long, Ruyin ;
Niu, Wenjing ;
Feng, Qun ;
Yang, Ranran .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 :376-386
[6]   Online low-key conspicuous behavior of fashion luxury goods: The antecedents and its impact on consumer happiness [J].
Chen, Mingliang ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Xie, Zhaohan ;
Niu, Jiahui .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2021, 20 (01) :148-159
[7]   Who are the low-carbon activists? Analysis of the influence mechanism and group characteristics of low-carbon behavior in Tianjin, China [J].
Chen, Weidong ;
Li, Jingqian .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 683 :729-736
[8]   Applying social media to environmental education: is it more impactful than traditional media? [J].
Chung, Chi-Hung ;
Chiu, Dickson K. W. ;
Ho, Kevin K. W. ;
Au, Cheuk Hang .
INFORMATION DISCOVERY AND DELIVERY, 2020, 48 (04) :255-266
[9]   The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: A meta-analysis [J].
Cologna, Viktoria ;
Siegrist, Michael .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 69
[10]   Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions [J].
De Leeuw, Astrid ;
Valois, Pierre ;
Ajzen, Icek ;
Schmidt, Peter .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 42 :128-138