Clinician Perspectives Regarding the Impact of Information Technology on Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network Survey

被引:0
作者
Arafat, Waddah [1 ]
Fu, Paul, Jr. [2 ]
Wagner, Andrew J. [3 ]
Osterman, Travis [4 ]
Martin, Daniel B. [5 ]
Sugalski, Jessica [6 ]
Heinrichs, Tricia [6 ]
Racz, Jennifer [7 ]
Tevaarwerk, Amye J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Simmons Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Natl Comprehens Canc Network, Plymouth Meeting, PA USA
[7] Exact Sci Corp, Madison, WI USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Rochester, MN USA
来源
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS | 2023年 / 7卷
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.23.00056
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) support high-quality cancer care. Little is known about the impact of information technology (IT) tools on the operational and technical aspects of MTBs. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network EHR Oncology Advisory Group formed a workgroup to investigate the impact of IT tools such as EHRs and virtual conferencing on MTBs. METHODS The workgroup created a cross-sectional survey for oncology clinicians (eg, pathology, medical, surgical, radiation, etc) participating in MTBs at 31 National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions. A standard invitation e-mail was shared with each EHR Advisory Group Member with a hyperlink to the survey, and each member distributed the survey to MTB participants at their institution or identified the appropriate person at their institution to do so. The survey was open from February 26, 2022, to April 26, 2022. Descriptive statistics were applied in the analysis of responses, and a qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended responses was completed. RESULTS Individuals from 27 institutions participated. Almost all respondents (99%, n = 764 of 767) indicated that their MTBs had participants attending virtually. Most indicated increased attendance (69%, n = 514 of 741) after virtualization with the same or improved quality of discussion (75%, n = 557 of 741) compared with in-person MTBs. Several gaps between the current and ideal state emerged regarding EHR integration: 57% (n = 433 of 758) of respondents noted the importance of adding patients for MTB presentation via the EHR, but only 40% (n = 302 of 747) reported being able to do so most of the time. Similarly, 87% (n = 661 of 760) indicated the importance of documenting recommendations in the EHR, but only 53% (n = 394 of 746) reported this occurring routinely. CONCLUSION Major gaps include the lack of EHR integration for MTBs. Clinical workflows and EHR functionalities could be improved to further optimize EHRs for MTB management and documentation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Privacy, Security, Electronic Health Records
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 2019 National Electronic Health Records Survey Public Use File National Weighted Estimates
[3]   Virtual Tumor Board Increases Provider Attendance and Case Presentations [J].
Davis, Catherine H. ;
Ho, Jason ;
Stephenson, Ryan ;
August, David A. ;
Gee, Heather ;
Weiner, Joseph ;
Alexander, H. Richard ;
Pitt, Henry A. ;
Berger, Adam C. .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (10) :717-+
[4]   Impact on Quality of Documentation and Workload of the Introduction of a National Information Standard for Tumor Board Reporting [J].
Ebben, Kees C. W. J. ;
Sieswerda, Melle S. ;
Luiten, Ernest J. T. ;
Heijns, Joan B. ;
van der Pol, Carmen C. ;
Bessems, Maud ;
Honkoop, Aafke H. ;
Hendriks, Mathijs P. ;
Verloop, Janneke ;
Verbeek, Xander A. A. M. .
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2020, 4 :346-356
[5]  
El Saghir Nagi S, 2014, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, pe461, DOI 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e461
[6]   Higher number of multidisciplinary tumor board meetings per case leads to improved clinical outcome [J].
Freytag, Marius ;
Herrlinger, Ulrich ;
Hauser, Stefan ;
Bauernfeind, Franz G. ;
Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria A. ;
Landsberg, Jennifer ;
Buermann, Jens ;
Vatter, Hartmut ;
Holderried, Tobias ;
Send, Thorsten ;
Schumacher, Martin ;
Koscielny, Arne ;
Feldmann, Georg ;
Heine, Mario ;
Skowasch, Dirk ;
Schaefer, Niklas ;
Funke, Benjamin ;
Neumann, Michael ;
Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H. .
BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
[7]   Multidisciplinary tumor boards as videoconferences - a new challenge in the COVID-19 era [J].
Gross, M. W. ;
Laubli, H. ;
Cordier, D. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 (04) :572-573
[8]   Analysis and impact of a multidisciplinary lymphoma virtual tumor board [J].
Habermann, Thomas M. ;
Khurana, Arushi ;
Lentz, Ruth ;
Schmitz, John J. ;
von Bormann, Alexander G. ;
Young, Jason R. ;
Hunt, Christopher H. ;
Christofferson, Sara N. ;
Nowakowski, Grzegorz S. ;
McCullough, Kristen B. ;
Horna, Pedro ;
Wood, Adam J. ;
Macon, William R. ;
Kurtin, Paul J. ;
Lester, Scott C. ;
Stafford, Scott L. ;
Chamarthy, Ushrasree ;
Khan, Faraz ;
Ansell, Stephen M. ;
King, Rebecca L. .
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2020, 61 (14) :3351-3359
[9]   A Virtual Tumor Board Platform: A Way to Enhance Decision-Making for Complex Malignancies [J].
Hopkins, Steven E. ;
Vidri, Roberto J. ;
Hill, Maureen, V ;
Vijayvergia, Namrata ;
Farma, Jeffrey M. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 278 :233-239
[10]   Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Database [J].
Hsu, Po-Kuei ;
Chien, Ling-, I ;
Huang, Chien-Sheng ;
Yeh, Yi-Chen ;
Huang, Pin-, I ;
Chen, Ming-Huang ;
Chen, Sheng-Yu ;
Yen, Chueh-Chuan ;
Hsu, Han-Shui .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) :572-585