How does green finance affect cleaner industrial production and end-of-pipe treatment performance? Evidence from China

被引:12
作者
Fang, Yong [1 ]
Shao, Zhenquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
Green finance; Cleaner production performance; End-of-pipe treatment performance; Industrial structure optimization; Environmental regulation; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24513-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effectively identifying the role and mechanism of green finance in environmental governance provides an important guarantee that green finance serves the ecological environment. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2001 to 2015, this paper explores the impact of green finance on cleaner industrial production and end-of-pipe treatment and further reveals the mediating effect of industrial structure optimization and the moderating effect of environmental regulation. The results show that (1) China's cleaner industrial production performance, end-of-pipe treatment performance and systematic governance performance show a clear upwards trend, distributed in stages in the eastern, central and western regions from high to low. (2) At the national level, green finance promotes cleaner production performance but inhibits end-of-pipe treatment performance. However, it can be seen from the results of the sub-sample, the eastern and central regions are consistent with the overall effect, with heterogeneous effects in the western region. (3) The optimization of industrial structure plays a partial intermediary role in the impact of green finance on cleaner production and end-of-pipe treatment. (4) Both "market-incentive" and "command-and-control" environmental regulations weaken the positive impact of green finance on cleaner production; "market-incentive" environmental regulation alleviates the negative impact of green finance on end-of-pipe treatment, while the moderating effect of "command-and-control" environmental regulation on end-of-pipe treatment is not significant.
引用
收藏
页码:33485 / 33503
页数:19
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Green finance: An empirical analysis of the Green Climate Fund portfolio structure [J].
Amighini, Alessia ;
Giudici, Paolo ;
Ruet, Joel .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
[2]   Environmental performance evaluation: A state-level DEA analysis [J].
Aviles-Sacoto, Estefania Caridad ;
Aviles-Sacoto, Sonia Valeria ;
Guemes-Castorena, David ;
Cook, Wade D. .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2021, 78
[3]   Interaction effects in econometrics [J].
Balli, Hatice Ozer ;
Sorensen, Bent E. .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (01) :583-603
[4]   A socio-technical perspective on low carbon investment challenges - Insights for UK energy policy [J].
Bolton, Ronan ;
Foxon, Timothy J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 14 :165-181
[6]  
Caselli F, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P679
[7]   Information communication technology (ICT), smart urbanization, and environmental quality: Evidence from a panel of developing and developed economies [J].
Chatti, Walid ;
Majeed, Muhammad Tariq .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 366
[8]   Measuring Corporate Social Performance: An Efficiency Perspective [J].
Chen, Chien-Ming ;
Delmas, Magali .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 20 (06) :789-804
[9]   Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :2935-2946
[10]  
China Banking Regulatory Commission WWF PWC, 2014, SUST PERF CHIN BANK, DOI [10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0066/full/html, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0066/FULL/HTML]