Research synthesis in times of crisis: setting the agenda for mixed method, collaborative research on poverty in a post-pandemic world

被引:2
作者
Garthwaite, Kayleigh [1 ]
Patrick, Ruth [2 ]
Power, Maddy [2 ]
Warnock, Rosalie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Social Policy Sociol & Criminol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Research synthesis; meta-ethnography; collaboration; ethics; poverty; covid-19; ETHICS; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2022.2113268
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
COVID-19 immediately and radically necessitated changes in the way we worked as social researchers; not only in terms of fieldwork, but also in terms of collaboration. In this paper, we outline the rationale, processes, and potential of a collective of 14 research teams both inside and outside of academia working together across the UK to synthesise findings on the experiences of over 4,000 families parents and carers living on a low-income during the pandemic. Drawing on an approach based on meta-ethnography, our collective body of work comprises novel evidence and insights generated with a major cohort of families living on a low-income, through which we examine the impacts of the pandemic, and implications for social policy. This paper focuses on the practical, ethical, and methodological learnings and reflections on the processes of research synthesis in the pandemic context, and beyond. We set out the underpinning principles that guided our collaborative efforts before we explore the possibilities and challenges of working together to produce coherent, timely, and relevant findings that were shared with policy makers and those in power. Finally, we emphasise the significant potential of working collaboratively, and stress the importance of continuing to do so in a post-pandemic context.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 815
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Qualitative Research, DOI [10.1177/1468794103033003, DOI 10.1177/1468794103033003]
[2]  
Arday J., 2018, DISMANTLING RACE HIG
[3]   Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt [J].
Atkins, Salla ;
Lewin, Simon ;
Smith, Helen ;
Engel, Mark ;
Fretheim, Atle ;
Volmink, Jimmy .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[4]  
Bhopal K, 2018, White Privilege: The Myth of a Post-Racial Society
[5]  
Bishop L., 2012, TIMESCAPES METHODS G
[6]   An ethics of care research manifesto [J].
Brannelly, Tula .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE AND CARING, 2018, 2 (03) :367-378
[7]  
Britten Nicky, 2002, J Health Serv Res Policy, V7, P209, DOI 10.1258/135581902320432732
[8]  
Coverdale A. M., 2021, NCRM WAYFINDER GUIDE
[9]  
Craig G.., 2019, The Missing Dimension: Where is 'Race' in Social Policy Teaching and Learning?
[10]   Big data, qualitative style: a breadth-and-depth method for working with large amounts of secondary qualitative data [J].
Davidson E. ;
Edwards R. ;
Jamieson L. ;
Weller S. .
Quality & Quantity, 2019, 53 (1) :363-376