System Identification of Enterprise Innovation Factor Combinations-A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Method

被引:9
作者
Dou, Zixin [1 ]
Sun, Yanming [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
来源
SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
system identification; corporate governance; institutional pressure; enterprise innovation; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; INCENTIVES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.3390/systems12020053
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
High-tech manufacturing enterprises, as innovative entities, are a key focus of national attention. Currently, such enterprises are facing both internal governance pressure and external institutional pressure. Unlike traditional studies that mostly use regression equations, this article uses the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method to examine how high-tech manufacturing enterprises can coordinate their internal governance mechanisms and external institutional pressures to achieve optimal innovation. This improves the complex mechanism of the multiple factors jointly explaining corporate innovation, and also helps to elucidate the nonlinear relationship between internal governance factors, external institutional factors, and corporate innovation, effectively enriching research methods and results. However, there has not been any research on the issue of enterprise innovation from the perspective of coordinating the two, which urgently needs to be addressed. This article examines how high-tech manufacturing enterprises can reconcile their internal governance mechanisms with external institutional pressures to achieve optimal innovation. The results showed that (1) a single factor cannot constitute the necessary conditions for innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises, but executive and shareholder governance have universality in the innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises; (2) in the absence of political advantages, high-tech manufacturing enterprises should focus on the coordinated development of internal governance, making board, executive, and shareholder governance the core conditions for innovative development; (3) with political advantages as the main focus and market attention as a supplement, high-tech manufacturing enterprises promote innovative development by combining executive and shareholder governance. This finding indicates a significant substitution effect between government legitimacy and board governance, and confirms that the importance of obtaining government legitimacy for high-tech manufacturing innovation is higher than market legitimacy. This article enriches the research on enterprise innovation by linking internal corporate governance with external institutional pressure, expands the research on the coordination relationship between institutional pressure and corporate governance, and has enlightening significance in revealing the collaborative path for innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   OWNERSHIP, COMPENSATION AND BOARD DIVERSITY AS INNOVATION DRIVERS: A COMPARISON OF U.S. AND CANADIAN FIRMS [J].
Atallah, Gamal ;
de Fuentes, Claudia ;
Panasian, Christine A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25 (03)
[2]  
Bai C.E., 2005, Econ. Res. J, V2, P81
[3]   Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? [J].
Balkin, DB ;
Markman, GD ;
Gomez-Mejia, LR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (06) :1118-1129
[4]   Do Board of Directors' roles and composition promote exploitative and exploratory innovations? Evidence from Tunisian listed firms [J].
Berraies, Sarra ;
Rejeb, Wajdi Ben .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 15 (04) :628-656
[5]   Corporate culture, innovation and board size: recent evidence from machine learning and earnings conference calls [J].
Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn ;
Jiraporn, Pornsit .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2023, 23 (06) :1361-1378
[6]   Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies [J].
Chen, Xiaohong ;
Yi, Na ;
Zhang, Lu ;
Li, Dayuan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 :304-311
[7]  
Chen Z.J., 2016, EC MANAG, V38, P57
[8]   Managerial incentives and risk-taking [J].
Coles, JL ;
Daniel, ND ;
Naveen, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 79 (02) :431-468
[9]   FAKING IT OR MUDDLING THROUGH? UNDERSTANDING DECOUPLING IN RESPONSE TO STAKEHOLDER PRESSURES [J].
Crilly, Donal ;
Zollo, Maurizio ;
Hansen, Morten T. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (06) :1429-1448
[10]   Institutional pressures and the diffusion of organisational innovation: evidence from Brazilian firms [J].
dos Santos, Matheus Graciani ;
Borini, Felipe Mendes ;
Pereira, Rafael Morais ;
Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2020, 32 (07) :869-880