European validation of an image-derived AI-based short-term risk model for individualized breast cancer screening-a nested case-control study

被引:5
作者
Eriksson, Mikael [1 ,2 ]
Roman, Marta [3 ]
Graewingholt, Axel [4 ]
Castells, Xavier [3 ]
Nitrosi, Andrea [5 ]
Pattacini, Pierpaolo [5 ]
Heywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia [6 ]
Rossi, Paolo G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Nobelsv 12A, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[3] Hosp del Mar Med Res Inst, IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Mammographiescreening Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
[5] Azienda Unita Sanit Locale IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggia Emilia, Italy
[6] Brustdiagnost Munchen & FFB gGmbH, Referenzzentrum Mammog Munich, Munich, Germany
来源
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE | 2024年 / 37卷
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Breast cancer; Risk prediction; Artificial intelligence; Validation; Mammography screening; Europe; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100798
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Image-derived artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk models for breast cancer have shown high discriminatory performances compared with clinical risk models based on family history and lifestyle factors. However, little is known about their generalizability across European screening settings. We therefore investigated the discriminatory performances of an AI-based risk model in European screening settings. Methods Using four European screening populations in three countries (Italy, Spain, Germany) screened between 2009 and 2020 for women aged 45-69, we performed a nested case-control study to assess the predictive performance of an AI-based risk model. In total, 739 women with incident breast cancers were included together with 7812 controls matched on year of study-entry. Mammographic features (density, microcalcifications, masses, left-right breast asymmetries of these features) were extracted using AI from negative digital mammograms at study-entry. Two-year absolute risks of breast cancer were predicted and assessed after two years of follow-up. Adjusted risk stratification performance metrics were reported per clinical guidelines. Findings The overall adjusted Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (aAUC) of the AI risk model was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70-0.75) for breast cancers developed in four screening populations. In the 6.2% [529/8551] of women at high risk using the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines thresholds, cancers were more likely diagnosed after 2 years follow-up, risk -ratio (RR) 6.7 (95% CI 5.6-8.0), compared with the 69% [5907/ 8551] of women classified at general risk by the model. Similar risk-ratios were observed across levels of mammographic density. Interpretation The AI risk model showed generalizable discriminatory performances across European populations and, predicted -30% of clinically relevant stage 2 and higher breast cancers in -6% of high -risk women who were sent home with a negative mammogram. Similar results were seen in women with fatty and dense breasts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Brookland, Robert K.
    Meyer, Laura
    Gress, Donna M.
    Byrd, David R.
    Winchester, David P.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [2] Comparison of Mammography AI Algorithms with a Clinical Risk Model for 5-year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: An Observational Study
    Arasu, Vignesh A.
    Habel, Laurel A.
    Achacoso, Ninah S.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Cord, Jason B.
    Esserman, Laura J.
    Hylton, Nola M.
    Glymour, M. Maria
    Kornak, John
    Kushi, Lawrence H.
    Lewis, Donald A.
    Liu, Vincent X.
    Lydon, Caitlin M.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Navarro, Daniel A.
    Pu, Albert
    Shen, Li
    Sieh, Weiva
    Yoon, Hyo-Chun
    Lee, Catherine
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
  • [3] Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue
    Bakker, Marije F.
    de Lange, Stephanie V.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Emaus, Marleen J.
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Bisschops, Robertus H. C.
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    de Jong, Matthijn D. F.
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Mali, Willem P. T. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) : 2091 - 2102
  • [4] Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer
    Berry, DA
    Cronin, KA
    Plevritis, SK
    Fryback, DG
    Clarke, L
    Zelen, M
    Mandelblatt, JS
    Yakovlev, AY
    Habbema, JDF
    Feuer, EJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) : 1784 - 1792
  • [5] Effect of Baseline Breast Density on Breast Cancer Incidence, Stage, Mortality, and Screening Parameters: 25-Year Follow-up of a Swedish Mammographic Screening
    Chiu, Sherry Yueh-Hsia
    Duffy, Stephen
    Yen, Amy Ming-Fang
    Tabar, Laszlo
    Smith, Robert A.
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (05) : 1219 - 1228
  • [6] A regional population-based hereditary breast cancer screening tool in Italy: First 5-year results
    Cortesi, Laura
    Baldassarri, Bruna
    Ferretti, Stefano
    Razzaboni, Elisabetta
    Bella, Mariangela
    Bucchi, Lauro
    Canuti, Debora
    De Iaco, Pierandrea
    De Santis, Giorgio
    Falcini, Fabio
    Galli, Vania
    Godino, Lea
    Leoni, Maurizio
    Perrone, Anna Myriam
    Pignatti, Marco
    Saguatti, Gianni
    Santini, Donatella
    de'Bianchi, Priscilla Sassoli
    Sebastiani, Federica
    Taffurelli, Mario
    Tazzioli, Giovanni
    Turchetti, Daniela
    Zamagni, Claudio
    Naldoni, Carlo
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (07): : 2579 - 2589
  • [7] Evaluation of an AI Model to Assess Future Breast Cancer Risk
    Damiani, Celeste
    Kalliatakis, Grigorios
    Sreenivas, Muthyala
    Al-Attar, Miaad
    Rose, Janice
    Pudney, Clare
    Lane, Emily F.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Montana, Giovanni
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
  • [8] Delaloge S, 2018, Gov identifier NCT03672331
  • [9] Current perspective The ethics of risk-stratified cancer screening
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    John, Stephen D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 187 : 1 - 6
  • [10] DOrsi C, 2018, ACR BI- RADS Atlas, V4th