Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor

被引:2
|
作者
Dilme, Roser Vives [1 ]
Rivas, Juan Gomez [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hernandez, Laura Fernandez [1 ]
Sanchez, Irene de la Parra [1 ]
del Hoyo, Rafael Sanchez [4 ]
Romo, Maria Isabel Galante [1 ]
Gonzalez, Enrique Redondo [1 ]
Perez, Jose Luis Senovilla [1 ]
Montarroso, Lorena Fernandez [1 ]
Sierra, Jesus Moreno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Urol, C Prof Martin Lagos s-n, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Urol, Madrid, Spain
[3] European Assoc Urol EAU, Young Acad Off YAU, Urotechnol Working Grp, Arnhem, Netherlands
[4] Hosp Clin San Carlos IdISSC, Inst Hlth Res, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
关键词
oncological outcomes; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; prostate-specific antigen density; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; ANTIGEN DENSITY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; GLEASON SCORE; INCREASED RISK; CANCER; BIOPSY; STRATIFICATION; PATHOLOGY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1177/17562872241229250
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate. Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA). Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score >= 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months. Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (p < 0.0001), PSA persistence (p < 0.0001), and Gleason >= 7 (p < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (p = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 versus 0.771) and Gleason >= 7 (AUC 0.683 versus 0.649). Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score >= 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with a Preoperative PSA Value &lt;4 ng/ml Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Zugor, Vahudin
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    Witt, Jorn H.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (05) : 2079 - 2083
  • [2] Surgical and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Preoperative PSA &gt;20 ng/ml Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Zugor, Vahudin
    Witt, Jorn H.
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Porres, Daniel
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (05) : 2091 - 2095
  • [3] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Yusuf Arikan
    Mithat Eksi
    Ali Ihsan Tasci
    Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 1027 - 1035
  • [4] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Arikan, Yusuf
    Eksi, Mithat
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 1027 - 1035
  • [5] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Mazzone, Elio
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [6] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [7] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in elderly patients. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes
    Porres, D.
    Pfister, D.
    Labanaris, A. P.
    Zugor, V.
    Witt, J. H.
    Heidenreich, A.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (10): : 1424 - +
  • [8] Predictive Factors for Early Biochemical Recurrence Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Mitsunari, Kensuke
    Fukushima, Hajime
    Kurata, Hiroki
    Harada, Junki
    Nakamura, Yuichiro
    Matsuo, Tomohiro
    Ohba, Kojiro
    Mochizuki, Yasushi
    Imamura, Ryoichi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (07) : 3149 - 3154
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes
    Banno, Taro
    Nakamura, Kazutaka
    Ozaki, Akihiko
    Kouchi, Yukiko
    Ohira, Tadashi
    Shimmura, Hiroaki
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) : 2125 - 2133
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21