Impact of a VA-ECMO in Combination with an Extracorporeal Cytokine Hemadsorption System in Critically Ill Patients with Cardiogenic Shock-Design and Rationale of the ECMOsorb Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Haertel, Franz [1 ]
Lehmann, Thomas [2 ]
Heller, Tabitha [2 ]
Fritzenwanger, Michael [1 ]
Pfeifer, Ruediger [1 ]
Kretzschmar, Daniel [1 ]
Otto, Sylvia [1 ]
Bogoviku, Jurgen [1 ]
Westphal, Julian [1 ]
Bruening, Christiane [1 ]
Gecks, Thomas [1 ]
Kaluza, Mirko [3 ]
Moebius-Winkler, Sven [1 ]
Schulze, P. Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Jena, Dept Cardiol & Intens Care, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Jena, Ctr Clin Studies, Salvador Allende Pl 27, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Jena, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
关键词
shock; ECMO; CytoSorb(& REG; cytokine removal; ICU; acute heart failure; extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support; RESUSCITATION COUNCIL GUIDELINES; CONVENTIONAL CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; LIFE-SUPPORT; DOUBLE-BLIND; SEPSIS; SURVIVAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12154893
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiogenic shock and arrest present as critical, life-threatening emergencies characterized by severely compromised tissue perfusion and inadequate oxygen supply. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) serves as a mechanical support system for patients suffering shock refractory to conventional resuscitation. Despite the utilization of VA-ECMO, clinical deterioration due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting from the underlying shock and exposure of blood cells to the artificial surfaces of the ECMO circuit may occur. To address this issue, cytokine adsorbers offer a valuable solution by eliminating blood proteins, thereby controlling SIRS and potentially improving hemodynamics. Consequently, a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial will be carried out with ECMOsorb. Methods and Study Design: ECMOsorb is a single-center, controlled, randomized, triple-blinded trial that will compare the hemodynamic effects of treatment with a VA-ECMO in combination with a cytokine adsorber (CytoSorb((R)), intervention) to treatment with VA-ECMO only (control) in patients with cardiogenic shock (with or without prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)) requiring extracorporeal, hemodynamic support. Fifty-four patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the intervention or control group over a 36-month period. The primary endpoint of ECMOsorb is the improvement of the Inotropic Score (IS) 72 h after the intervention. Prognostic indicators, including mortality rates, hemodynamic parameters, laboratory findings, echocardiographic assessments, quality of life measurements, and clinical parameters, will serve as secondary outcome measures. The safety evaluation encompasses endpoints such as air embolisms, allergic reactions, peripheral ischemic complications, vascular complications, bleeding incidents, and stroke occurrences. Conclusions: The ECMOsorb trial seeks to assess the efficacy of a cytokine adsorber (CytoSorb((R)); CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) in reducing SIRS and improving hemodynamics in patients with cardiogenic shock who are receiving VA-ECMO. We hypothesize that a reduction in cytokine levels can lead to faster weaning from inotropic and mechanical circulatory support, and ultimately to improved recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock-Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial
    Thiele, Holger
    Freund, Anne
    Gimenez, Maria Rubini
    de Waha-Thiele, Suzanne
    Akin, Ibrahim
    Poss, Janine
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Fuernau, Georg
    Graf, Tobias
    Nef, Holger
    Hamm, Christian
    Bohm, Michael
    Lauten, Alexander
    Schulze, P. Christian
    Voigt, Ingo
    Nordbeck, Peter
    Felix, Stephan B.
    Abel, Peter
    Baldus, Stephan
    Laufs, Ulrich
    Lenk, Karsten
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Skurk, Carsten
    Pieske, Burkert
    Tschope, Carsten
    Hennersdorf, Marcus
    Wengenmayer, Tobias
    Preusch, Michael
    Maier, Lars S.
    Jung, Christian
    Kelm, Malte
    Clemmensen, Peter
    Westermann, Dirk
    Seidler, Tim
    Schieffer, Bernhard
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Mahabadi, Amir-Abbas
    Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
    Meincke, Felix
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    Kersten, Alexander
    Rottbauer, Wolfgang
    Boekstegers, Peter
    Muellenbach, Ralf
    Dengler, Thomas
    Kadel, Christoph
    Schempf, Benjamin
    Karagiannidis, Christian
    Hopf, Hans-Bernd
    Lehmann, Ralf
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 234 : 1 - 11
  • [2] Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock: rationale and design of the-label EURO SHOCK trial
    Banning, Amerjeet S.
    Adriaenssens, Tom
    Berry, Colin
    Bogaerts, Kris
    Erglis, Andrejs
    Distelmaier, Klaus
    Guagliumi, Giulio
    Haine, Steven
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Massberg, Steffen
    Orban, Martin
    Myrmel, Truls
    Vuylsteke, Alain
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Van de Werf, Frans
    Verheugt, Freek
    Flather, Marcus
    Sabate, Manel
    Vrints, Christiaan
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2021, 16 (15) : E1227 - U124
  • [3] Percutaneous versus surgical cannulation for femoro-femoral VA-ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock: Results from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry
    Wang, Liangshan
    Yang, Feng
    Zhang, Shuai
    Li, Chenglong
    Du, Zhongtao
    Rycus, Peter
    Tonna, Joseph E.
    Alexander, Peta
    Lorusso, Roberto
    Fan, Eddy
    Ogino, Mark
    Brodie, Daniel
    Combes, Alain
    Chen, Yih-Sharng
    Qiu, Haibo
    Peng, Zhiyong
    Fraser, John F.
    Shao, Juanjuan
    Jia, Ming
    Wang, Hong
    Hou, Xiaotong
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04) : 470 - 481