共 50 条
Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
被引:23
作者:
Dixit, Neal M.
[1
]
Parikh, Neil U.
[2
]
Ziaeian, Boback
[3
,4
]
Jackson, Nicholas
[5
]
Fonarow, Gregg C.
[3
,6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Keck Sch Med USC, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] UCLA, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Vet Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Div Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] UCLA, Dept Med Stat Core, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] UCLA, Dept Med, David Geffen Sch Med, 2-237 CHS, Mail Code 167917650, Charles E Young Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词:
cost-effectiveness analysis;
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction;
high-value care;
incremental cost effectiveness ratio;
guideline-directed medical therapy;
Markov model;
IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR;
NEPRILYSIN INHIBITION;
SACUBITRIL-VALSARTAN;
GLOBAL MORTALITY;
DETERMINE IMPACT;
ENALAPRIL;
MORBIDITY;
RISK;
STATEMENT;
EVENTS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.004
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is one of the most costly and deadly chronic disease states. The cost effectiveness of a comprehensive quadruple therapy regimen for HFrEF has not been studied.OBJECTIVES The authors sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of quadruple therapy comprised of beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors vs regimens composed of only beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (triple therapy), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers (double therapy).METHODS Using a 2-state Markov model, the authors performed a cost-effectiveness study using simulated populations of 1,000 patients with HFrEF based on the participants in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure) trial and compared them by treatment strategy (quadruple therapy vs triple and double therapy) from a United States health care system perspective. The authors also performed 10,000 probabilistic simulations.RESULTS Treatment with quadruple therapy resulted in an increase of 1.73 and 2.87 life-years compared with triple therapy and double therapy, respectively, and an increase in quality-adjusted life-years of 1.12 and 1.85 years, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of quadruple therapy vs triple therapy and double therapy were $81,000 and $51,081, respectively. In 91.7% and 99.9% of probabilistic simulations quadruple therapy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of <$150,000 compared with triple therapy and double therapy, respectively.CONCLUSIONS At current pricing, the use of quadruple therapy in patients with HFrEF was cost effective compared with triple therapy and double therapy. These findings highlight the need for improved access and optimal imple-mentation of comprehensive quadruple therapy in eligible patients with HFrEF. (J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2023;11:541-551) & COPY; 2023 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 551
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条