Lumateperone for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Number Needed to Treat, Number Needed to Harm, and Likelihood to Be Helped or Harmed br br

被引:8
作者
Citrome, Leslie [1 ,3 ]
Durgam, Suresh [2 ]
Edwards, John B. [2 ]
Davis, Robert E. [2 ]
机构
[1] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY USA
[2] Intracellular Therapies Inc, New York, NY USA
[3] Leslie Citrome, 11 Med Pk Dr,Ste 102, Pomona, MD 10970 USA
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; EXTENDED-RELEASE TABLETS; ACUTE EXACERBATION; SAFETY PROFILE; DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; PLACEBO; CARIPRAZINE; PANSS; ARIPIPRAZOLE;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.22r14631
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe lumateperone for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults using number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH). Methods: Data were obtained from the 3 phase 2/3 lumateperone trials, conducted between 2011 and 2016, in patients with schizophrenia diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, or Fifth Edition. Efficacy was assessed using various response criteria; tolerability was principally assessed using rates of adverse events (AEs). Results: Pooled data of the 2 informative studies showed statistically significant estimates of NNT versus placebo for lumateperone 42 mg/d for the responder thresholds of z 20% and z 30% improvement on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores, with NNT for response versus placebo at 4 weeks and endpoint of 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-36) and 8 (95% CI, 5-21), respectively. Pooling all studies, discontinuation because of AEs was uncommon, and the NNH versus placebo was 389 (not statistically significant from placebo [NS]). Rates of individual AEs resulted in NNH versus placebo > 10 except for somnolence/sedation (NNH of 8; 95% CI, 6-12). The occurrence of weight gain z 7% from baseline yielded a NNH estimate of 122 (NS). Rates of akathisia were lower for patients receiving lumateperone compared with placebo. LHH for response versus somnolence/sedation was 1 for lumateperone (similar to the risperidone active control group); otherwise, lumateperone exhibited LHH ratios that were much greater than 1 for all other AEs and that ranged from 13.6 to 48.6 for these other benefit-risk calculations. Conclusions: In 3 phase 2/3 trials, the benefit-risk assessment of lumateperone was favorable as measured by NNT, NNH, and LHH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01499563, NCT02282761, NCT02469155
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, V4th ed., DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[2]  
[Anonymous], REXULTI BREXP TABL O
[3]  
CAPLYTA, LUM CAPS OR US PROD
[4]   Compelling or irrelevant? Using number needed to treat can help decide [J].
Citrome, L. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 117 (06) :412-419
[5]   The ABC's of dopamine receptor partial agonists - aripiprazole, brexpiprazole and cariprazine: the 15-min challenge to sort these agents out [J].
Citrome, L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 69 (11) :1211-1220
[7]   When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed [J].
Citrome, L. ;
Ketter, T. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 67 (05) :407-411
[8]   Relative vs. absolute measures of benefit and risk: what's the difference? [J].
Citrome, L. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 121 (02) :94-102
[9]   Asenapine for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved sublingually absorbed second-generation antipsychotic [J].
Citrome, L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (12) :1762-1784
[10]   Iloperidone for schizophrenia: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly commercialised second-generation antipsychotic [J].
Citrome, L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (08) :1237-1248